Politics Thread

[xuphan]

The banks had no problem with Trump’s loan. They were paid back in full and I believe on time. This whole thing is a political attack. Nothing more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe he could finally pay contractors who he still owes for the Taj Mahal. Unless you think that is political as well.

https://www.northjersey.com/story/ne...ty/4547037002/

[bjf123]

Maybe he could finally pay contractors who he still owes for the Taj Mahal. Unless you think that is political as well.

https://www.northjersey.com/story/ne...ty/4547037002/

Unrelated to this issue, but those contractors should be able to file a lien against the property to get paid.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[paulxu]

The banks had no problem with Trump’s loan. They were paid back in full and I believe on time. This whole thing is a political attack. Nothing more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The laws he broke were broken by other people before; and they were held accountable.
He just ran into a situation where he was held accountable. If you want to understand it, here's the opinion with annotations to help:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...annotated.html

[bjf123]

Paywall. Also, anything from the NYT regarding a Republican is hardly going to be a fair or accurate bit of writing. Might be some truths in there, but it will be spun to fit the narrative and you won’t know what truths that help the other side are conveniently ignored.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[GoMuskies]

400 bucks lighter today, but at least I've got some Trump sneaks on the way....probably.

[94GRAD]

400 bucks lighter today, but at least I've got some Trump sneaks on the way....probably.

You ever get your Big Baller Brand kicks?

[GoMuskies]

No, they appear to have products for as low as $155. What's big baller about that?

To actually be baller, you need $400 gold shoes. Obviously.

[paulxu]

Paywall. Also, anything from the NYT regarding a Republican is hardly going to be a fair or accurate bit of writing. Might be some truths in there, but it will be spun to fit the narrative and you won’t know what truths that help the other side are conveniently ignored.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't have an account and when I click the link it goes through. Did you try it?
It's hard to spin a "narrative" when you are printing an opinion from the court.
They annotate it, but don't (obviously) change it.
Here it is from another link:

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.ne...t-20240216.pdf

[bobbiemcgee]

And I still can’t believe there are people floating Michelle Obama name out there. She literally hates politics and everything about it. 0.0% chance she ever runs for anything.

Biden will be the candidate unless he’s dead or in a nursing home. It’s too late in the game.

LBJ quit March 31st

[Xville]

LBJ quit March 31st

And howd that work out for the dems? That's my point, well that, and suggesting that Michelle Obama would run is complete nonsensical.