Page 2604 of 2681 FirstFirst ... 160421042504255425942602260326042605260626142654 ... LastLast
Results 26,031 to 26,040 of 26802

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #26031
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,416
    Don't be stupid enough to think these people running things now actually care about waste and fraud.
    If they really did, they wouldn't be cutting IRS who actually increases revenue and goes after fraud.

    Unlike with other federal agencies, cutting the IRS means the government collects less money and finds fewer tax abuses. Economic studies have shown that for every dollar spent by the IRS, the agency returns between $5 and $12, depending on how much income the taxpayer declared. A 2024 report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found that the IRS found savings of $13,000 for every additional hour spent auditing the tax returns of very wealthy taxpayers — a return on investment that “would leave Wall Street hedge fund managers drooling,” in the words of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
    https://www.propublica.org/article/h...p-musk-deficit
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  2. #26032
    Junior
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,619
    And now for a dose of reality:

    Total US debt = 36T

    Afghan War cost = 2.3T

    Iraq War = 2 to 3T

    Ukraine War 0.3T

    Covid response - depending on who you ask and how the numbers are calculated: 4.6T to 16T


    GAO says 4.6T https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106647

    The USC Schaeffer Institute says up to 14T: https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/c...-new-research/

    Cutler and Larry Summers study says: 16T: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article...nited%20States.

    This says 11T: https://www.covidmoneytracker.org/


    Yes, all three wars were MAJOR mistakes - but can the libs please now admit so was the Covid response!!
    When they say, “We must protect our democracy,” switch the word “democracy” to “bureaucracy”, and it will all make sense.

  3. #26033
    Junior
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,619
    Paul said he wants to go back to 2000. I'm wondering if he's willing to have the bottom 75% wage earners to begin ponying up the amount of taxes they were paying back then? Share of taxes paid by the bottom 50% has decreased from 5% to 2.3%. Share of taxes paid by wage earners between 25% and 50% has dropped from ~14% to 8.4% of all taxes collected.

    Shouldn't everyone have some skin in the game?







    https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/f...tax-data-2024/
    When they say, “We must protect our democracy,” switch the word “democracy” to “bureaucracy”, and it will all make sense.

  4. #26034
    Supporting Member noteggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    4,030
    Okay, I’m going to mark Paul down as a revenue problem vs spending? Well except for unnecessary wars.

    So tax cuts and the wars are why we’re 31T in debt? But has nothing to do with other unnecessary spending? I’m starting to think democrats really don’t want to reduce fraud and waste with the bloated federal government. Except with the inefficient IRS.

  5. #26035
    Junior
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,619
    To put another way, the average tax rate paid by the bottom 50% has dropped from 4.92% in 2001 to 3.11% in 2020.

    Bottom 75% has dropped from 7.47% in 2001 to 5.35% in 2020.

    The top 1% also dropped in that same period. Going from an avg tax rate of 27.6% to 25.99%. However, as you see in the graph above, the share of taxes paid by the top 1% has increased from ~34% to 45.8%. This appears to be mostly driven by the top 0.001% / 0.01% of wage earners. Both groups grew by about 40% in that time period.

    Lots of moving parts, but there's obviously a concentration of wealth effect. But how much of that has been driven by tech, and by increased economic activity due to lower tax rates, and increased stock trading resulting from lower cap gains tax rates?


    https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-t...and-tax-shares
    When they say, “We must protect our democracy,” switch the word “democracy” to “bureaucracy”, and it will all make sense.

  6. #26036
    Quote Originally Posted by XU_Lou View Post
    To put another way, the average tax rate paid by the bottom 50% has dropped from 4.92% in 2001 to 3.11% in 2020.

    Bottom 75% has dropped from 7.47% in 2001 to 5.35% in 2020.

    The top 1% also dropped in that same period. Going from an avg tax rate of 27.6% to 25.99%. However, as you see in the graph above, the share of taxes paid by the top 1% has increased from ~34% to 45.8%. This appears to be mostly driven by the top 0.001% / 0.01% of wage earners. Both groups grew by about 40% in that time period.

    Lots of moving parts, but there's obviously a concentration of wealth effect. But how much of that has been driven by tech, and by increased economic activity due to lower tax rates, and increased stock trading resulting from lower cap gains tax rates?


    https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-t...and-tax-shares
    Lou: What is your solution(s) to the $36T debt problem? As an example use a 40 year span for debt reduction or whatever # of years you choose.

  7. #26037
    Supporting Member bjf123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Section 114
    Posts
    6,214
    This column was written a number of years ago, but I’m guessing the math relationship is still there. We can’t tax our way out of our fiscal crisis. Serious spending cuts are needed.

    http://walterewilliams.com/eat-the-rich/


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Golf is a relatively simple game, played by reasonably intelligent people, stupidly.

  8. #26038
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    18,687
    Quote Originally Posted by bjf123 View Post
    This column was written a number of years ago, but IÂ’m guessing the math relationship is still there. We canÂ’t tax our way out of our fiscal crisis. Serious spending cuts are needed.

    http://walterewilliams.com/eat-the-rich/


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Makes sense and I donÂ’t think anyone is advocating for that. IÂ’d like both, and prudent cutting not just cutting things “we don’t like.”
    Last edited by Xville; 03-10-2025 at 07:37 PM.

  9. #26039
    Supporting Member waggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Gold Country
    Posts
    11,601

  10. #26040
    Junior
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,619
    Quote Originally Posted by hoopster68 View Post
    Lou: What is your solution(s) to the $36T debt problem? As an example use a 40 year span for debt reduction or whatever # of years you choose.
    this:

    Quote Originally Posted by bjf123 View Post
    This column was written a number of years ago, but I’m guessing the math relationship is still there. We can’t tax our way out of our fiscal crisis. Serious spending cuts are needed.

    http://walterewilliams.com/eat-the-rich/
    How many different ways does this have to be said?? Why aren't you listening?
    When they say, “We must protect our democracy,” switch the word “democracy” to “bureaucracy”, and it will all make sense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •