Politics Thread

[Muskie in dayton]

Ha! Thanks for the laugh. Due process that’s hysterical. Do you only believe in due process when it involves your kind of guy?

You have no issue spouting off election denier stories with zero facts over and over and over again after court case after court case exhibited that there was no case. But yeah that’s because everyone is just trying to screw trump, amirite? again speculative nonsense.

Speaking of grift, have any idea whose family he’s married to? I doubt it.

Due process, you’re a funny man.a fan of a guy who spouts theories with zero facts, but calling for due process in this case. Hilarious

Sonny Hostin has some advice for you.

[Muskie in dayton]

If it's proven in a court of law that you are a sexual assaulter, should that person hold the office of president?

Absolutely not, once a conviction is completed with sentencing.

edit: notice how I answer your questions. Give it a try, unless you are scared to.

[paulxu]

I have never advocated for voter fraud.

Good grief.

[paulxu]

Absolutely not, once a conviction is completed with sentencing.

edit: notice how I answer your questions. Give it a try, unless you are scared to.

Perfect deflection. You agree a person shouldn't be president if convicted. But let's wait for sentencing? What does that mean?
If he got probation, he'd still be convicted and according to you shouldn't be president.

What a bunch of nonsense.

[Xville]

I have never beat my wife. Now answer my question, Mr. Voter fraud advocate.

Again, get this through your thick skull - THOSE COURT CASES HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH FRAUD. They had everything to do with the court cases that allowed the fraud. The only people who don’t believe in widespread voter fraud are those that actually believed the Seltzer Iowa poll. lol.

Oh, and they are STILL ballots in CA. 🤡

Geezus. There is a difference between some voter fraud here and there and the belief that it was so widespread that it changed the election.

The only people that believe that are you, Lou and Mor along with the other election deniers. Not the side of history id want to be on, and agreeing with Lou and Mor on anything would make me look inward and reevaluate my life.

[Xville]

Sonny Hostin has some advice for you.

Don’t even know nor who you are talking about. My guess? You watch too much tv and spend way too much time on x.

I’ll let slide though. I know you’re in mourning over Gaetz, the (at the time) 35 year old man who at the very least doesn’t understand how effed up it is to date an 18 year old.

[Xville]

Absolutely not, once a conviction is completed with sentencing.

edit: notice how I answer your questions. Give it a try, unless you are scared to.

lol now it’s sentencing. How convenient of an add on. You’re a joke

[Strange Brew]

Don’t even know nor who you are talking about. My guess? You watch too much tv and spend way too much time on x.

I’ll let slide though. I know you’re in mourning over Gaetz, the (at the time) 35 year old man who at the very least doesn’t understand how effed up it is to date an 18 year old.

Thank goodness you let it slide. ;)

Sonny, on ABC had to read multiple Legal retractions for statements similar to yours.

[Strange Brew]

Absolutely not, once a conviction is completed with sentencing.

edit: notice how I answer your questions. Give it a try, unless you are scared to.

About whom is he speaking?

Trump, Gaetz and Pete haven’t been convicted of that.

Trump was found liable. Paul and his college educated friends have a hard time distinguishing between Civil and Criminal Law.

[paulxu]

About whom is he speaking?

Trump, Gaetz and Pete haven’t been convicted of that.

Trump was found liable. Paul and his college educated friends have a hard time distinguishing between Civil and Criminal Law.

Whatever are you talking about? Do you not understand the difference?
Trump was convicted in a criminal trial in New York, and sentencing is pending.
He was found liable in another suit, a civil one, brought by E. Jean Carroll.