Page 1362 of 2681 FirstFirst ... 3628621262131213521360136113621363136413721412146218622362 ... LastLast
Results 13,611 to 13,620 of 26805

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #13611
    All-Conference Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,938
    Quote Originally Posted by STL_XUfan View Post
    Are you disagreeing with our resident legal scholar on this board...
    Thanks, I’ll add that to me title.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  2. #13612
    Supporting Member bobbiemcgee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    11,892
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
    Thanks, I’ll add that to me title.
    you misspelled my.
    2023 Sweet 16

  3. #13613
    Supporting Member Masterofreality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    On America's Great North Coast
    Posts
    22,953
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    How 'bout sending me the link to the video so I can take a look at it.
    Go on Twitter and see for yourself. I can’t post a video tweet on here
    "I Got CHAMPIONS in that Lockerroom!" -Stanley Burrell

  4. #13614
    All-Conference Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,938
    Quote Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee View Post
    you misspelled my.
    Nah, feeling like a pirate today.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  5. #13615
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
    Thought is was. How is it not?
    Well…as you know it’s never cut and dry in the law. Guess I’d need more info…but it could certainly meet an exception. And do Congressional hearings follow the rules of evidence? From what little I saw last night…I’m guessing no.

  6. #13616
    All-Conference Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,938
    Quote Originally Posted by Nigel Tufnel View Post
    Well…as you know it’s never cut and dry in the law. Guess I’d need more info…but it could certainly meet an exception. And do Congressional hearings follow the rules of evidence? From what little I saw last night…I’m guessing no.
    Good point. It’s not like there’s going to be any cross and I’m really not sure what anyone is trying to prove/disprove with this.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  7. #13617
    Supporting Member Masterofreality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    On America's Great North Coast
    Posts
    22,953
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post


    This is either (A) Fake News or (B) An Alternative fact. You can take your pick.

    https://www.usnews.com/news/national...cted-officials
    Nice try. From the Dutch guy that picked up the noose:
    “ The gallows was too small and weak to be used, Persson said. It was erected as a symbol.”
    A symbol of what? Maybe the execution of Democracy by Antifa and progressives?
    Pence was never in danger.

    But I’m sure you wasted your night last night watching a clipped shitshow of a “hearing” by partisan hacks and believing every thing you were fed in that propaganda extravaganza.
    I went to a great concert.
    Last edited by Masterofreality; 06-10-2022 at 03:04 PM.
    "I Got CHAMPIONS in that Lockerroom!" -Stanley Burrell

  8. #13618
    Supporting Member Masterofreality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    On America's Great North Coast
    Posts
    22,953
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    I found it. She's not trying to stop it. She just want people to put their names to a vote...since they are unwilling to vote on a law to protect children.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLqnxzkJIJ4
    “Put their names to a vote”? On a Bipartisan Justice protection bill already passed by the Senate?
    Seems as if Republicans would be very happy to “put their name” on that bill.
    Maybe not Democrats?
    Children have zero to do with protecting Supreme Court Justices, except, you know, the fact that Justices are trying to STOP children unborn from being slaughtered. Who exactly is against protecting innocent children??
    "I Got CHAMPIONS in that Lockerroom!" -Stanley Burrell

  9. #13619
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Masterofreality View Post
    Pence was never in danger..
    That explains why he stayed and greeted the "tourists" in the Senate; if he was in danger, his Secret Service detail would have evacuated him to a safe spot.

    I didn't watch the hearing. Most of what is being presented has been shown before. Some new stuff. Coherent time line probably was beneficial to those buried in a Fox universe for the last year and a half. Did notice some sedition charges the other day.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  10. #13620
    When just one isnt enough X-band '01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Overlook Hotel
    Posts
    15,194
    Can we at least all agree that Jack Del Rio would have gotten a $100K bonus for his comments if he made them as a member of Dallas's coaching staff?

    Too bad he's in Washington and got a $100K fine instead for his ill-fated comparison between the Capitol insurrection and the George Floyd protests back in 2020.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •