Results 5,511 to 5,520 of 7634
Thread: Covid-19
-
08-10-2021, 11:34 AM #5511
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3,113
"If our season was based on A-10 awards, there’d be a lot of empty space up in the rafters of the Cintas Center." - Chris Mack
-
08-10-2021, 11:44 AM #5512
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 18,692
You are either being obtuse or are too ignorant to tell the difference. My statements were based on my opinion at the time, very clearly, opinion. This doctor is making definitive statements based on anecdotal evidence that goes against what thousands upon thousands of people in the medical community have stated. Nice try though.
Since you love the last word, go ahead and make it. I blame myself for falling for your troll self. I feel sorry for you.Last edited by Xville; 08-10-2021 at 11:49 AM.
-
08-10-2021, 12:03 PM #5513
-
08-10-2021, 12:38 PM #5514
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 2,619
Oh I understand that you've admitted to spreading misinformation, however, you have yet to admit that you subsequently lied about those statements with this so-called "explanation":
This is obviously a blatant and demonstrable lie. I think an apology would go a long way towards restoring your credibility on this board. You know, “just some food for thought”.
-
08-10-2021, 12:49 PM #5515
-
08-10-2021, 01:17 PM #5516
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 18,692
-
08-10-2021, 01:28 PM #5517
-
08-10-2021, 01:53 PM #5518
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Steamboat Springs, CO
- Posts
- 744
-
08-10-2021, 02:12 PM #5519
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 496
-
08-10-2021, 02:23 PM #5520
You are screaming into the void.
There is, of course, no way you can incontrovertibly prove that the vaccine is safe over the long term, because it's relatively new. So they get to claim some sort of false intellectual high ground by simply saying they are 'undecided' because we 'don't know enough about the long term effects'. Then they call everything 'ad hominem' which is code for 'questioning their bullshit sources' or just say that everything is a logical fallacy.
Here is the key to the game - you are effectively being asked to prove that a future event (long term adverse vaccine effects) will not occur. You of course cannot do that, so they get to remain 'undecided' until you do so, which is not possible.
Edit: Most people who chose to get the vaccine did so because they believed that the risk of getting COVID was more dangerous than the possibility of long term side effects. That's it. Most of the available evidence thus far would support that. We, of course, don't know what will happen in the future, however vaccine side effects tend to be immediate so I feel safe getting the shot.Last edited by boozehound; 08-10-2021 at 02:25 PM.
Eat Donuts!
Bookmarks