Page 485 of 2681 FirstFirst ... 3854354754834844854864874955355859851485 ... LastLast
Results 4,841 to 4,850 of 26805

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #4841
    Sophomore Mrs. Garrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    With Tootie, Blair, Natalie & Jo
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by xudash View Post
    The Democrats are burning themselves to the ground.

    That is juxtaposed against the Dow at +29,000 and the Phase One signed. And that is with CNN, et al losing their collective minds.

    You should be ashamed if you believe and support this farce.
    I wonder if this would be a farce if this was Obama?

  2. #4842
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrett View Post
    I wonder if this would be a farce if this was Obama?
    It would be. But I agree with the point you're making re: who would and would not consider it a farce.

  3. #4843
    Supporting Member X-man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Now in Section 106 (Row L), after stints in Sections 104 and 105.
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
    Right, rates were effectively 0 during Obama’s term.

    Trump’s tax and trade policies pushed the economy to such a positive level that the Fed felt comfortable enough to raise rates which as im sure you know normally causes traders to sell.

    So, I’ll make it simple doc.

    Trump policies good. Economy grows fast. Fed raised rates. Stock run slows temporarily.

    So, not a correction due to policy but a reaction to a booming economy due to great policy.

    Thanks for playing..
    Uh, so the Fed lowering rates last year, along with its active participation in the REPO markets, had nothing to do with the market rebound?? Don't be such a hypocrite.
    Xavier always goes to the NCAA tournament...Projecting anything less than that this season feels like folly--Eamonn Brennan, ESPN (Summer Shootaround, 2012)

  4. #4844
    Quote Originally Posted by xudash View Post

    You should be ashamed if you believe and support this farce.
    And confirming, this is not about Trump?
    Run the table.

  5. #4845
    Sophomore Mrs. Garrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    With Tootie, Blair, Natalie & Jo
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    It would be. But I agree with the point you're making re: who would and would not consider it a farce.
    I'm talking about to the Trump humpers. You know the same people who were outraged because Obama wore a tan suit.

    As someone who has voted 50/50 for Democrats and Republicans since becoming eligible to vote, I am amazed that any educated person would vote for him. Much less support the current state of affairs.

  6. #4846
    Supporting Member X-man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Now in Section 106 (Row L), after stints in Sections 104 and 105.
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
    Right, rates were effectively 0 during Obama’s term.

    Trump’s tax and trade policies pushed the economy to such a positive level that the Fed felt comfortable enough to raise rates which as im sure you know normally causes traders to sell.

    So, I’ll make it simple doc.

    Trump policies good. Economy grows fast. Fed raised rates. Stock run slows temporarily.

    So, not a correction due to policy but a reaction to a booming economy due to great policy.

    Thanks for playing..
    And since you apparently believe that expansionary Fed policy has no impact on stocks, you must be a huge fan of Obama. Since Trump was inaugurated, stocks have gained about 34%. During Obama's first term during the same time period, stocks rose 68%. They likely would have increased even faster had Republicans embraced deficit spending under Obama the way they have under Trump.
    Xavier always goes to the NCAA tournament...Projecting anything less than that this season feels like folly--Eamonn Brennan, ESPN (Summer Shootaround, 2012)

  7. #4847
    All-Conference Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,938
    Quote Originally Posted by X-man View Post
    And since you apparently believe that expansionary Fed policy has no impact on stocks, you must be a huge fan of Obama. Since Trump was inaugurated, stocks have gained about 34%. During Obama's first term during the same time period, stocks rose 68%. They likely would have increased even faster had Republicans embraced deficit spending under Obama the way they have under Trump.
    Your first sentence is the opposite of what I wrote. Get better.

    Republicans did not control Congress during Obama’s first term.
    Last edited by Strange Brew; 01-17-2020 at 11:19 AM.

  8. #4848
    Supporting Member xudash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,655
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrett View Post
    I wonder if this would be a farce if this was Obama?
    With all facts the same - - without question.
    X A V I E R

  9. #4849
    Sophomore Mrs. Garrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    With Tootie, Blair, Natalie & Jo
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by xudash View Post
    With all facts the same - - without question.
    I don't believe you.

    I have so much respect for the Republicans who sided with America when it came to Nixon as opposed to these weaklings who choose party over country in 2020.

    I would love to know what Trump has on Lindsey Graham. The guy went from #1 critic to sucking his balls (think I just answered my own question) in no time.
    Last edited by Mrs. Garrett; 01-17-2020 at 12:05 PM.

  10. #4850
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrett View Post
    I'm talking about to the Trump humpers. You know the same people who were outraged because Obama wore a tan suit.

    As someone who has voted 50/50 for Democrats and Republicans since becoming eligible to vote, I am amazed that any educated person would vote for him. Much less support the current state of affairs.
    First post and truly can't believe that I am wading into this cesspool - frankly to quote the great Marvin Lewis, "I see better than I hear". And what I see is a focus on America first - taking care of our own. I see the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years. I see real wages for the middle class and lower classes rising faster than the income for the top tiers. I see also minority unemployment at the lowest level ever for African Americans.

    Would I prefer he be more respectful and stop tweeting - he** yeah. Would I prefer he be more dignified in public and when dealing with foreign leaders - again a big he** yeah.

    At the end of the day it is a balancing act - you win some, you lose some. People have a choice and a chance in today's economy; there is job mobility that hasn't been available for years. I'll take that.

    Didn't vote for him in 2016 - probably voting for him in 2020 and yes, I do consider myself to be somewhat educated...

    Now return to your mud-slinging (or poo slinging if that's your style).

    Bad Billy Pratt signing off....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •