Page 114 of 2681 FirstFirst ... 14641041121131141151161241642146141114 ... LastLast
Results 1,131 to 1,140 of 26805

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #1131
    Sophomore ChicagoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    909
    The notion that our military is depleted is pure right-wing fiction. This is just another pay-off to line the pockets of the defense contractors who donate to GOP campaigns.

  2. #1132
    I still believe.
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Masterofreality View Post
    Depends if some of it is to increase the Enlisted Folks pay/ PTSD treatment, VA support.

    *Details*
    This would not be military spending, but money appropriated for the VA. Defense (DOD) and VA are entirely separate entities for funding and appropriations (which is a YUGE, YUGE mistake IMHO). These two entities should be tightly interwoven so care NEVER stops AND doesn't require a new entity (VA) to verify that which is already in the veterans health record when they separate before paying benefits and providing treatment.
    We've come a long way since my bench seat at the Fieldhouse!

  3. #1133
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,376
    Quote Originally Posted by muskiefan82 View Post
    This would not be military spending, but money appropriated for the VA. Defense (DOD) and VA are entirely separate entities for funding and appropriations (which is a YUGE, YUGE mistake IMHO). These two entities should be tightly interwoven so care NEVER stops AND doesn't require a new entity (VA) to verify that which is already in the veterans health record when they separate before paying benefits and providing treatment.
    Good point. His budget must also include a boost for the VA, because I was going off this sentence from the WSJ article about the proposed boost in military spending (that, on second look, apply to three different parts of the budget): "The budget proposal would prioritize border security, care for military veterans and “school choice,” without adding to the deficit, Mr. Mulvaney said."

  4. #1134
    Supporting Member Masterofreality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    On America's Great North Coast
    Posts
    22,953
    Good WSJ article re media outrage hypocrisy.
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-a...dia-1488223333
    "I Got CHAMPIONS in that Lockerroom!" -Stanley Burrell

  5. #1135
    Supporting Member Masterofreality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    On America's Great North Coast
    Posts
    22,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Masterofreality View Post
    You may not like what Trump is "leading" toward, but there is an interesting NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll today.

    NBC/WSJ poll: Who should take the lead in setting policy for the US?

    Trump + Hill GOP: 52%
    Hill Democrats: 37%


    Attachment 2155

    Despite all of the negative press, the country seems to trust the Republicans more. And The Dems- especially Nancy Pelosi are the most unpopular politicians...although Mitch McConnell is right there too.

    I'll REALLY be interested to see if NBC, which has become much more leftist in its reporting recently, actually shows this on tonight's newscast....of will they just bury it like they did many of the foibles of Obama. The poll doesn't quite fit their Chuck Todd narrative.
    Well, that question was answered. 3 lead stories taking potshots at the Administration about Russia, Yemen and the budget..which by the Way, Obama didn't bother to submit for many years....laced with a bunch of opinion but few facts, and ZERO about these NBC/WSJ generated polls.

    Methinks, that if the polls were reversed there would have been 15 minutes covering how "America was dismayed, discouraged and disillusioned". If this isn't a case of aggressive media bias, I don't know what is.
    "I Got CHAMPIONS in that Lockerroom!" -Stanley Burrell

  6. #1136
    Sophomore Caf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,399
    Trump wants compromise immigration bill: reports - The Hill

    Trump envisions a proposal that would allow some undocumented immigrants live and work in the U.S. without fear of deportation, but would stop short of offering them a pathway to citizenship.
    Why didn't any conservatives praise Obama for having the same policy at the beginning of his presidency? Why are conservatives not crying foul now??

  7. #1137
    Supporting Member bobbiemcgee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    11,892
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    "The budget proposal would prioritize border security, care for military veterans and “school choice,” without adding to the deficit, Mr. Mulvaney said."
    Well as far as military spending goes, Trump wants 54b increase (Mc Cain wants much more) while Mick's Tea Party wants to cut that much or more, so I would guess nothing gets done as usual.
    2023 Sweet 16

  8. #1138
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Caf View Post
    Trump wants compromise immigration bill: reports - The Hill



    Why didn't any conservatives praise Obama for having the same policy at the beginning of his presidency? Why are conservatives not crying foul now??
    I assume the liberal praise will come pouring in for Trump any time now.

    In other news, who gives a fuck what "conservatives" said or didn't say when Obama was in office and what "liberals" are saying or not saying now compared to what they said when Obama was in office? It's a particularly obnoxious game.

  9. #1139
    Sophomore Caf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,399
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    I assume the liberal praise will come pouring in for Trump any time now.

    In other news, who gives a fuck what "conservatives" said or didn't say when Obama was in office and what "liberals" are saying or not saying now compared to what they said when Obama was in office? It's a particularly obnoxious game.
    Yeah you're right. Better to judge things on their face rather than constantly comparing them to prior administrations.

  10. #1140
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Caf View Post
    Yeah you're right. Better to judge things on their face rather than constantly comparing them to prior administrations.
    Yes, I know it's a game both sides play. I just personally find it annoying. At least find the same person saying different things (like Obama on gay marriage....or Trump on virtually anything), because neither "side" speaks in unison.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •