Airing of Grievances: NIL/Portal

[xubrew]

No, you are missing the point. they CAN do it. Because there is no union. If that results in the formation of a union, then they will reach a new agreement through collective bargaining.

The scenario you are describing just doesnt make sense. If there were a union, then OF COURSE they couldnt unilaterally impose a cap. But there ISNT, so they CAN.

Okay, perhaps I’m missing something. I’m trying to understand this and I’m open to the possibility that I am missing something.

The NCAA has tried this before. Why was this considered to be blatantly illegal? There are coaches associations, but no unions. So what am I missing? And why are actual lawyers saying the NCAA cannot implement a cap like this?? And after the Alston Case ruling why did a Supreme Court Justice say to the NCAA that they needed to collectively bargain with the players?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/marcede...h=3f23580555e5