Rudy sez Trump repaid Cohen! Trump sez he didn't know about it! WTF?
Printable View
Rudy sez Trump repaid Cohen! Trump sez he didn't know about it! WTF?
This will only surprise the "some of the people, all of the time" that you can fool.
Drunk male student was savagely sexually assaulted by a female student according to UC.
https://reason.com/blog/2018/05/11/c...mpression=true
A girl did that to me too once. I married her.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
Thank you to the Supreme Court for striking down an inane federal law that prevented sports gambling outside of Nevada and Delaware.
So awesome. C'mon Ohio, do the right thing!Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
I can't wait to read the decision to see what dumb shit dissent RBG and Sotomayor came up with.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
Well it didn’t take long for congressional blowhards to express desire to intervene.
I understand that gambling is against his religion and all that, but why can't he just live with Utah not allowing gambling as the current state law?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Braun
This is more of a rhetorical question.
My guess is that he's doing the bidding of one Sheldon Adelson.Quote:
Originally Posted by Juice
So the swamp isn’t drained afterall? We’ve been fleeced!Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
Maybe we can get ZTE to run this operation. They need the jobs!
Base on what I heard on the news, which is not a good source for legal analysis, the dissent said, “yea, the law is unconstitutional, but we need to rewrite it to make it constitutional”, which isn’t the function of any court.Quote:
Originally Posted by Juice
But again, consider my source.
Which is code for, "Shit, states rights actually mean something, let's try to come up with something to stop that..."Quote:
Originally Posted by XU 87
Can't we just grab up that little weasel Kim while he's in Singapore and broadcast him being eaten by dogs on North Korean TV?
Agreed. Unfortunately, too many people think that is the function of the SCOTUS. If it’s unconstitutional, send it back to the legislative entity that wrote and tell them try agin.Quote:
Originally Posted by XU 87
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I read the opinions, of you are speaking about the baker’s case SCOTUS basically ruled against the Colorado Commission the levied the original punishment and punted on the big stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by bjf123
I believe Kennedy even wrote that you shouldn’t go around and discriminate against LGBTQ at your business.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The guy's making a pretty strong case for why regimes should hold onto nukes for dear life. Based on the conversation around this it seems like him and his family are going to skate free on 70 years of human rights abuse.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
Definitely not something I expected to see in this lifetime:
https://m.wsj.net/video/20180612/061...m4_960x540.jpg
Is that MoR (or XU87) and Caf finally breaking bread????Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
I'm okay with them skating on the past 70 years if it avoids 70 more years of human rights abuses (at some point, because it obviously won't happen right away).Quote:
Originally Posted by Caf
Yeah agreed. Will be interesting to see if Kim wants this done so he can keep the country closed or so he could open it up like Cuba is trying to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
History in the making folks
I'm way heavier than Kim, plus with a thick neck beard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamont Sanford
Trump was actually looking great in this. Looks like he lost some weight.
Also this is one of the funnier things coming out of this: https://www.reddit.com/r/WatchPeople...n_and_perfect/
This will be profoundly interesting to watch. I'm honestly not sure how this will go. I would assume that North Korea will need to open up for weapons inspectors similar to Iraq etc. Will they consistently allow that? How much monkey business will we tolerate, because you know there will be at least some. Whether this is a highly significant event or just another chapter will likely take years to play out. Kim Jong Il is batshit crazy, you know he is going to pull something at some point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Caf
He was, but now he's dead. I don't think Un is nearly as crazy, but it's a low bar.Quote:
Originally Posted by boozehound
I'm much taller than both of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamont Sanford
The deal is crap, good lord I thought I read Trump saying he was going in unprepared. That just proved it. He did nothing but reaffirm was the North and South agreed to a few months ago and gave a few things up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There's not really a deal, so it's kind of hard for it to be crap.
True. I felt it was crap when Dennis Rodman was brought in as the intermediary.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
Welp.
After the IG report today, EVERYBODY thinks James Comey is a disingenuous jerk.
What took them so long?
And, Hey Mueller. You've spent over $17 million on a dead end investigation...except for nailing Manafort for ish that has zero to do with the election. Then you had to get desperate to show you were doing something else so you go after Cohen for zero to do with the election or Russia. Overreach much? When are you One trick pony gonna finally pull the plug on this charade? It's become a Traveshamockery.
Four Trump advisers, 14 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Five of these people (including three former Trump aides) have already pleaded guilty. If Manafort and gates pay their tax bills, we will easily recoup the $17 million.Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterofreality
Surely that's fake news Bobbie.
Remember how pissed MOR was when the Bill Clinton investigation dragged on so long and wandered so far afield from the initial mandate? Neither do I.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
Bruh the federal government rounds to the nearest billion. $17 mil isn't even enough to get access to Don Jr.Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterofreality
When Muskie speaks...I want you people to sit up at attention.
58% of 'pubs think it's ok to rip your toddlers/babies away from you @ the border. Every living First Lady disagrees. Trump could fix it with a 30 second phone call.
There are reports on Facebook that this practice was going on under Obama. Are those reports true or are they all about more fake news?Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee
Beyond that, are the parents of these children warned about this separation practice prior to crossing the border? I would think they would be. What kind of responsible parent would knowingly put their children at such separation risk?
Under Obama, there was a program called ATEP, Alien Transfer Exit Program, which separated families, especially men from their families, though it could also have separated children from their parents. Remember the photo from a month or so ago of the child in a cage that the main stream media was using the point out the cruelty of Trump’s policies? It was also shared lots of times on Facebook. Turns out it was taken in 2014 at a detention center in place under Obama. Once that came out, media outlets and talking heads quickly deleted the photo from their Twitter feeds.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The better question is what kind of situations are they running from that makes the possibility of being separated from their children better than staying put. The risk of being separated is better than the risk of being dead.Quote:
Originally Posted by xudash
In some situations they might very well be the most responsible, selfless parents you'd ever meet.
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by D-West & PO-Z
And it’s my understanding that some family separation occurred under Obama’s administration, but it was more the exception. The difference is the zero tolerance policy now which results in charging the parents with a crime, even if the only “crime” was crossing the border.