Man, that is a really big load of crap you're building there AZ.
Results 131 to 140 of 177
Thread: Taxes
-
10-30-2012, 12:58 PM #131
-
10-30-2012, 01:16 PM #132
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Columbus, Indiana
- Posts
- 917
Ok... I have just realized it is pointless to have an intelligent discussion with you....
So.. I am wealthy... Therefore, I must want an all-for-one society with no effort to help others. Get off your high horse and give me a break.
FYI.... I am fairly certain I give a far higher percentage of my income to charity and helping others than you and the vast majority of Americans living in this society do. I give plenty back and I do out of my own will to do so. I don't need to gov't taking it from me to do so.
I hope you are successful and someday get a clue of the difference between inefficient government spending and taxation vs. free-will charity and the organizations it supports.
You also completely fail to realize the difference between gov't supplying law and infrastructure vs. wealth redistribution.Last edited by kmcrawfo; 10-30-2012 at 01:24 PM.
-
10-30-2012, 01:31 PM #133
I run a business. I pay social security for everyone that works for me. I pay medicare for everyone that works for me. I pay health insurance for everyone that works for me. I give Christmas bonuses, and I give a bonus each quarter that we are profitable. I match 401K contributions. None of this is a part of the local, state, and federal taxes that you are discussing. While I don't have any choice about the payroll taxes, I did have a choice about the other things, and it is money that comes straight out of my pocket.
The reason that small business people think that Obama hates them is that they don't feel that he understands or appreciates what they do for society. 30 people from 30 different families got a paycheck from me today. I paid money into their social security fund. I paid money into their medicare fund. I paid money into their retirement fund. With all of that, all I seem to hear is that the millionaires and billionaires just aren't doing their share to help out.
My government should be trying to figure out how I can make twice as much so I can give out 60 paychecks to 60 families and pay double the taxes while I am at it.
-
10-30-2012, 01:51 PM #134
Listen Crawford and Glow, you greedy bastards. Everyone knows you'd work just as hard and employ just as many people at the same pay and benefits even if your marginal tax rate was 70%. Stop the charade!
-
10-30-2012, 02:10 PM #135
-
10-30-2012, 02:26 PM #136
This. Actually, this - squared.
Perhaps a law should be enacted that requires liberals to give away 50% of their earnings to charity, so that they're not caught making fools of themselves when they start lecturing people who truly do give back at high rates of giving.
Barrack Obama - arguing that Romney paid 14% in taxes last year. Of course, he wasn't paying in based on W-2 or K-1 earnings; he paid in based on capital gains taxes, etc. Beyond that little fact is the fact that his tax bill was 7 digits. 7 effing digits.
Certainly, it is offensive that a law abiding American paid what the tax code mandated that he pay and that he actually paid in millions.X A V I E R
-
10-30-2012, 02:31 PM #137"Give a toast to my brother, hug your family, and do everything possible to live the life you dream of. God Bless."
-Matt McCormick
-
10-30-2012, 03:49 PM #138
Crawford and Glow make the point far better than I ever could. Rich people are evil and they should be made to pay. They're all greedy bastards. Really, when did become such a bad thing to work your ass off to build something up? Now granted, there certainly are some greedy individuals out there, but the overwhelming majority (99% perhaps?) got where they are through hard work. And they care about their employees.
One more thing. Once ArizonaXUGrad makes his millions there is nothing stopping him - or any other "wealthy" individual with an Obama sign in his/her yard - to pay more than what their tax rate currently is.
-
10-30-2012, 04:44 PM #139
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 3,087
-
10-30-2012, 05:03 PM #140
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 3,087
The argument here isn't if he was doing what was legal it's if the tax code itself is a problem. My opinion is that the #1 problem we have today is a massively fat defense budget which should be dramatically scaled back. My second issue is the problems within the tax code itself that cause Romney to pay just 14% of his income in taxes. I think that was just 2011 and 2010 right? We don't what he paid in the past 10 years save for those two since he believes his father failed at his run because of the disclosure.
As far as myself and my tax returns, I have traditionally paid out about 7-8% of my income in cash charitable contributions and another 5-7% in non-cash goods. This does not include my time that I donate as well. The remainder of my income is put to mortgage, monthly expenses, car, and savings. This will be the first year my wife and I file together so I don't know exactly what her donations have been. Ever since I moved away from living paycheck to paycheck as a young 20-something I have always hovered in that 12-14% range. I have always needed to save income though to ensure I never go into debt for repairs and maintenance for my house and car.
This doesn't change the fact that if I made $400k+ or even $250k+ and my taxes go up you won't see me crying about the government taxing my money away.
To Khans - The rich should pay a lot more than it's fair share because they have a lot more to lose if our society fails. They are getting a dollar for dollar greater benefit for having their wealth protected by foreign invaders and those inside. The top 1% have most of the wealth, the most to lose, and they don't want to pay anymore to keep it. That does not make much economic sense to me.
Bookmarks