Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9101112 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 115
  1. #101
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cincinnati
    Posts
    377
    Quote Originally Posted by whopper View Post
    As a parent of 2 X girls far away in St Johns country(Conn) I have heard that Myles had some kind of transgression that forced him to leave. If not (but probably true) would there be any chance of him returning to be a backup? I don't know anything but it would be an ideal situation with actually little pressure as Goodin is the starter. Just asking
    I'm pretty sure that he has dropped out of school.That chapter in Xavier history is over.As far as why Myles left, not sure we'll ever know the true story.

  2. #102
    Supporting Member D-West & PO-Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montgomery
    Posts
    17,648
    Quote Originally Posted by muskieindent View Post
    If he is projected to be a first round pick,I think he would have to consider leaving.Why take the risk of further injury and lose out on a few million
    $.This injury certainly isn't going to help his stock though.
    Oh yeah if he is confident he is a first round pick hes gone, no doubt about it.
    "I’m willing to sacrifice everything for this team. I’m going to dive for every loose ball, close out harder on every shot, block out for every rebound. I’m going to play harder than I’ve ever played. And I need you all to follow me." -MB '17

  3. #103
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    2,129
    Quote Originally Posted by D-West & PO-Z View Post
    Oh yeah if he is confident he is a first round pick hes gone, no doubt about it.
    i really doubt that any team would draft him in the 1st round this year

  4. #104
    Freshman
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by bigdiggins View Post
    As Fr. only learn one position, and Omara can't move laterally, it would almost have to be Gaston at the 4 with one of the others at the 5.

    I think Gaston will do surprisingly well at the 4. I probably have a minority opinion in this, but I think he has a nice jump shot from 8-10 feet and moves better than a lot of fans think. He can put the ball on the floor and go to the basket. He's been filling the role of an undersized 5. He has rebounded well but struggled to get a shot against bigger players. I think he can get himself into position to rebound well from the 4 position. He can help spread out the defense, allowing Q more room to operate.

    I think that if he is given the chance to show these aspects of his game that X will become dynamically a different team, instead of trying to duplicate how it has been playing, without a very key piece that made the earlier style work.

  5. #105
    Junior XMuskieFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    2,527
    Quote Originally Posted by Thor in 204 View Post
    I think Gaston will do surprisingly well at the 4. I probably have a minority opinion in this, but I think he has a nice jump shot from 8-10 feet and moves better than a lot of fans think. He can put the ball on the floor and go to the basket. He's been filling the role of an undersized 5. He has rebounded well but struggled to get a shot against bigger players. I think he can get himself into position to rebound well from the 4 position. He can help spread out the defense, allowing Q more room to operate.

    I think that if he is given the chance to show these aspects of his game that X will become dynamically a different team, instead of trying to duplicate how it has been playing, without a very key piece that made the earlier style work.
    I would actually expect this decently often and think it could be effective. Early in the season, when Kaiser was out and we'd be in foul trouble, we'd see Gaston at the 4. I would almost expect to see this tomorrow against Sanogo and Delgado. Going to be a tough task on the boards, so Tyrique and Gaston in the game would make sense.

  6. #106
    Administrator Muskie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    13,046
    Quote Originally Posted by Thor in 204 View Post
    I think Gaston will do surprisingly well at the 4. I probably have a minority opinion in this, but I think he has a nice jump shot from 8-10 feet and moves better than a lot of fans think. He can put the ball on the floor and go to the basket. He's been filling the role of an undersized 5. He has rebounded well but struggled to get a shot against bigger players. I think he can get himself into position to rebound well from the 4 position. He can help spread out the defense, allowing Q more room to operate.

    I think that if he is given the chance to show these aspects of his game that X will become dynamically a different team, instead of trying to duplicate how it has been playing, without a very key piece that made the earlier style work.
    I'm willing to go with a Gaston/Jones 4/5. But Foul discipline will be at a premium. No depth at PG and not much at the 4/5 depending on the lineup.
    "He's a little bit ball-dominant, he needs to have the ball in his hands, and he's not a good shooter." Ball-dominant … isn't that a nice way of calling someone a ball hog? Where is my Jay Bilas Thesaurus?

    Follow XH on Twitter

    Follow XH on Facebook

  7. #107
    Junior sirthought's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NKY
    Posts
    2,795
    Mack should try more lineups with O'Mara or Jones at the 5 and Gaston or O'Mara at the 4. Gates would likely start at the 4. Bernard off the bench at 3.

    Combined production of the 4 and 5 has been frustrating, but having both Gaston and O'Mara on the floor might help overcome their deficiencies. One scores better. The other rebounds better.

    I know college hoops is trending away from the big men, but asking one big man on the floor to cover every possible big man defensive assignment, every potential rebound, and still score is a lot for some players.

    Guys like Gates and Bluiett at the 4 worked better the past couple years because of who was playing the 5, not because they are spectacular 4s. (Hopefully Gates grows a pair and improves.)

    This might mean we have to change the game plan a bit, but I'd say if we can open shooters with more big man screens, that would be a good step.

    As far as next year, I'd guess that Sumner's chances of the first round a slim to none right now. Even with a chance to get paid overseas, he'd be better off to risk potential injury coming back and playing on a loaded XU team, where he's sure to gain more national exposure.

  8. #108
    Sophomore xuwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    1,874
    Stainbrook will get more minutes from here on out, especially when we have foul issues. It is also going to be a great opportunity for players whose performances have drastically fallen off lately to re-establish themselves as major contributors to the team. Fact is, they must.

  9. #109
    Supporting Member D-West & PO-Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montgomery
    Posts
    17,648
    Quote Originally Posted by XUMIOH12 View Post
    i really doubt that any team would draft him in the 1st round this year
    I agree.
    "I’m willing to sacrifice everything for this team. I’m going to dive for every loose ball, close out harder on every shot, block out for every rebound. I’m going to play harder than I’ve ever played. And I need you all to follow me." -MB '17

  10. #110
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Thor in 204 View Post
    I think Gaston will do surprisingly well at the 4. I probably have a minority opinion in this, but I think he has a nice jump shot from 8-10 feet and moves better than a lot of fans think. He can put the ball on the floor and go to the basket. He's been filling the role of an undersized 5. He has rebounded well but struggled to get a shot against bigger players. I think he can get himself into position to rebound well from the 4 position. He can help spread out the defense, allowing Q more room to operate.

    I think that if he is given the chance to show these aspects of his game that X will become dynamically a different team, instead of trying to duplicate how it has been playing, without a very key piece that made the earlier style work.

    He'll be fine offensively at the 4.

    The problem will come defensively if we play man.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •