Results 71 to 80 of 273
Thread: College Basketball Season 23-24
-
11-29-2023, 12:51 PM #71"I’m willing to sacrifice everything for this team. I’m going to dive for every loose ball, close out harder on every shot, block out for every rebound. I’m going to play harder than I’ve ever played. And I need you all to follow me." -MB '17
-
11-29-2023, 12:53 PM #72
-
11-29-2023, 01:18 PM #73
-
11-29-2023, 01:54 PM #74
Yeah, I will never say never and I have not been shocked when other coaches have left but there is something comfortable about Miller having already taken that route and come back. He's made a lot of money, and while more money is always enticing, I feel more secure than I have with him as coach (in terms of not leaving) than I have before.
"I’m willing to sacrifice everything for this team. I’m going to dive for every loose ball, close out harder on every shot, block out for every rebound. I’m going to play harder than I’ve ever played. And I need you all to follow me." -MB '17
-
11-29-2023, 02:28 PM #75
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 9,076
Steele set us back years with his coaching. He ruined players. He had teams that good/great coaches would have made runs with. Imagine Paul Scruggs with a good coach. Imagine Naji Marshall with a good coach. Players got worse under his style, and it killed the momentum of this program coming off of a number 1 seed. Completely deflated it.
A coach with Miller's pedigree was hired to get us back to that level sooner than would be expected under normal circumstances. If I'm being honest, I am concerned about our recruiting profile. The perennial Big East contenders (UConn, Marquette, Creighton, Villanova) are getting the difference makers and we seem to be getting the tier below.
Tough to judge Miller on that so far. We've needed beef for 5+ years and we still don't have it.
Travis Steele made us have to climb the mountain again. We're back where we were when Mack took over. He raised the profile in his tenure. Steele punctured that balloon.Last edited by drudy23; 11-29-2023 at 02:30 PM.
-
11-29-2023, 02:56 PM #76
I'm not sure I'm understanding the "woe is us" coming from this thread. Sure, Steele sucked, but we were in the Sweet 16, swept the national champs and were in the Big East Tournament finals last season. We've won twice as many NCAA Tournament games in the last 9 months than "perennial contender" Marquette has won in a decade. Creighton has been to the Sweet Sixteen like twice in its history. If you want to look up at Villanova and UConn and see that we have quite a hill to climb, sure. But Marquette and Creighton? I don't see it.
-
11-29-2023, 02:58 PM #77
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 9,076
This shows we had a good enough team to be relevant, and Steele took us to irrelevance. Hell, Jonas Hayes got more out of these guys.
It's not a leap to say these 4 teams have better players. To me, that's pretty obvious just by watching the games. But I also agree that teams like Creighton and Marquette have vastly under-performed in the tournament.Last edited by drudy23; 11-29-2023 at 03:04 PM.
-
11-29-2023, 03:02 PM #78
They definitely have better teams this year. No doubt about that. I don't see how their programs are in any way superior to ours, though. I can live with a bad year here and there as long as the program is solid. And we're in fine shape (no thanks to that one guy).
-
11-29-2023, 03:05 PM #79
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 9,076
UConn and Nova have superior programs. Creighton and Marquette, eh, they need to win in March.
-
11-29-2023, 04:13 PM #80
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 18,666
You could argue that UConn is the most successful program in the modern game and nova is probably top 5. No real shame in being behind those. We are not behind creighton and Marquette as programs. This year? Yeah program? Nope
Bookmarks