We all know Johnson is clearly the best shooter on the team. Why do we want to see "a lineup of Free, Nunge, Jones, Kunkel and Scruggs.."
I don't see it at all. More Nate = more wins. Less Nate = bad.
Results 161 to 165 of 165
-
11-28-2021, 01:06 PM #161
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 4,060
-
11-28-2021, 02:14 PM #162
Since that was my suggestion, I'll chime in to say I would interchange Kunkel and Johnson, and Odom and Scruggs.
Gives us great flexibility.
I'm particularly looking forward to a back court of Nunge, a healthy Free and Jones....he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
11-28-2021, 04:07 PM #163
Agree 100%!
And he doesn’t just shoot threes.
He attacks the rim and finishes + he draws fouls + he actually makes most of his free throws + he is solid with defense. There is no reason I can think of him not being a permanent starter. He played 40 minutes. I am even okay with him playing close to that many minutes if it means 30 points every times.
Nate + Nunge + Scruggs + Colby + Freemantle is my first five- no question. They have all earned it (Freemantle is a given).Last edited by IM4X; 11-28-2021 at 10:43 PM.
-
11-28-2021, 07:44 PM #164
No wonder he scored 30. He was out there for 9 minutes with no one guarding him
...he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
11-28-2021, 10:49 PM #165
Bookmarks