View Poll Results: Xavier's Most Important Player this Season Is...
- Voters
- 55. You may not vote on this poll
Results 31 to 39 of 39
-
11-29-2021, 10:32 AM #31...he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
11-29-2021, 11:49 AM #32
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 2,994
-
11-29-2021, 01:26 PM #33
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- SYMES TOWNSHIP
- Posts
- 398
Other because Nate is the man. I don't understand why his name was left off the poll.
-
11-29-2021, 03:33 PM #34
Ah...I see you posted that on the 26th. My bad.
...he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
11-29-2021, 09:00 PM #35
Still not following why Nate is “Other” but that is who got my vote. That being said, I think the most important player will change from game to game. Nunge seems like the most important player in a few games. Nate in a few. Scruggs arguably in the OSU game.
-
11-30-2021, 09:30 AM #36
I say Freemantle is the most important player to our success because we desperately need him and we don't know what we are going to get when he comes back.
-
04-02-2022, 09:35 AM #37
How bout now?
Team was winless without Nate. Nunge probably MVP for the year but the case for Nate as most important to success can be easily made on a team without anyone else to stretch the floor.
-
04-02-2022, 09:54 AM #38
Maybe but I think a case can be made for Colby as well. He was really good in the NIT final 4 and so was Xavier. Actually feel like Nate was too inconsistent and team would have been in the NCAA’s had he been more consistent knocking down shots. From the Butler game through the NIT, Nate was 9 of 37 from three for 24%. A lot of those misses were wide open. In the final game him and Kunkel went 3 of 17 from the floor. Inconsistency cost games and kept many other closer than they should have been.
-
04-02-2022, 01:42 PM #39
When thinking about the most important player, consider that the Musketeers did not make the NCAA. You could say the most important player is the one that, if they had performed or contributed more (or at all) would have made them a slam dunk tourney team.
If you decide Free seriously underperformed (not a stretch at all) you can determine perhaps that if Miles or Edwards would have been given more of a chance or shown more, that would have been the biggest difference.
If you think a shooter would have made the biggest difference, you might say Johnson or Kunkle so underperformed or that Kyky would have had the biggest effect if he had been given a chance (injury not withstanding) that would have made the biggest difference.I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I drink 2XS.
Bookmarks