Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 50
  1. #31
    B]TALE OF THE TAPE[/B]

    CJ vs Hankins

    Career FG%: CJ 48.5% Hankins 68.6%
    FG attempts per Minute: CJ .288 Hankins .309
    FT attempts per Minute: CJ .170 Hankins .102
    ORebs per Minute: CJ .082 Hankins .100
    DRebs per Minute: CJ .132 Hankins .143
    Asst per Minute: CJ .073 Hankins .048
    Steals per Minute: CJ .030 Hankins .017
    Blocks per Minute: CJ .014 Hankins .071
    TOs per Minute: CJ .085 Hankins .046
    Fouls per Minute: CJ .089 Hankins .085
    Points per Minute: CJ .387 Hankins .488


    Look, I'd take either of these guys in a heartbeat. If CJ had issues with Castlin, or Moore, or even Carter....then I'd get it. But Hankins was a stud.

  2. #32
    All-Conference Juice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,837
    Quote Originally Posted by MHettel View Post
    B]TALE OF THE TAPE[/B]

    CJ vs Hankins

    Career FG%: CJ 48.5% Hankins 68.6%
    FG attempts per Minute: CJ .288 Hankins .309
    FT attempts per Minute: CJ .170 Hankins .102
    ORebs per Minute: CJ .082 Hankins .100
    DRebs per Minute: CJ .132 Hankins .143
    Asst per Minute: CJ .073 Hankins .048
    Steals per Minute: CJ .030 Hankins .017
    Blocks per Minute: CJ .014 Hankins .071
    TOs per Minute: CJ .085 Hankins .046
    Fouls per Minute: CJ .089 Hankins .085
    Points per Minute: CJ .387 Hankins .488


    Look, I'd take either of these guys in a heartbeat. If CJ had issues with Castlin, or Moore, or even Carter....then I'd get it. But Hankins was a stud.
    CJ makes no sense. He kept talking about number or stats or something, and it turns out that Hankins had similar stats in less minutes. Then he argued team success as if that's the way to truly measure an individual. Then someone pointed out that X started winning more once Hankins began starting and he had no response.

    I know we all love CJ for what he did on the court and his twitter entertainment, but the guy isn't the brightest.

  3. #33
    All-Conference
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by Muskie View Post
    Who did CJ declare was the best transfer in X history?
    I'm guessing he thinks it's CJ.

    As for toughness, I'd bring Torraye out of retirement right now if I could. Loved how he played.

  4. #34
    Supporting Member D-West & PO-Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montgomery
    Posts
    17,037
    The whole thing is silly and Hankins was a good transfer.

    Honestly though if you could only have one guy for an X team give me CJ all day. He was what 6'5? He played like he was 6'9 down on the block tho. Dude was a player.
    "I’m willing to sacrifice everything for this team. I’m going to dive for every loose ball, close out harder on every shot, block out for every rebound. I’m going to play harder than I’ve ever played. And I need you all to follow me." -MB '17

  5. #35
    Sophomore Mrs. Garrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    With Tootie, Blair, Natalie & Jo
    Posts
    845
    Quote Originally Posted by D-West & PO-Z View Post
    The whole thing is silly and Hankins was a good transfer.

    Honestly though if you could only have one guy for an X team give me CJ all day. He was what 6'5? He played like he was 6'9 down on the block tho. Dude was a player.
    Agree. My memories though tend to be more favorable of players who went to the tournament. If you were only here one year and you didn't go dancing, I'm going to take the guy with similar numbers who went twice on two of the better teams in school history.

  6. #36
    Junior IM4X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    3,357
    Hankins was a stud and can not be thought of any less because he was not on an NCAA tournament team. I see it this way: He made that team better and X would have been in the NCAA Tournament instead of the NIT if Steele wasn’t so suborn about putting him out there more often with Jones earlier in the season. Travis does deserve credit for recognizing his talent, though.

    Hankins was as disruptive in the paint as just about any transfer we had. He was a legit threat on offense. He was all about the team. The kid was a warrior and delivered when called upon. To top it off, he was respectful and never complained.

    If anything, the team and the coach failed him more than anything else.
    Hankins was a great Musketeer. Period.
    Last edited by IM4X; 04-01-2020 at 11:25 AM.

  7. #37
    Sophomore Lamont Sanford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The freaking 'Nati
    Posts
    1,969
    Quote Originally Posted by IM4X View Post
    Hankins was a stud and can not be thought of any less because he was not on an NCAA tournament team. I see it this way: He made that team better and X would have been in the NCAA Tournament instead of the NIT if Steele wasn’t so suborn about putting him out there more often with Jones earlier in the season. Travis does deserve credit for recognizing his talent, though.

    Hankins was as disruptive in the paint as just about any transfer we had. He was a legit threat on offense. He was all about the team. The kid was a warrior and delivered when called upon. To top it off, he was respectful and never complained.

    If anything, the team and the coach failed him more than anything else.
    Hankins was a great Musketeer. Period.
    Amen. +1. Hanky McSpanky was a great Musketeer in his limited time on-campus. I love CJ...but he's completely wrong about #35.
    "Xavier born and Xavier bred, and when I am gone I will be Xavier Dead!"
    NJ!NP! 8/30/12

  8. #38
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    20,260
    Pete Maravich never made an NCAA tournament.
    Neither did Klay Thompson or Paul George.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  9. #39
    Sophomore Mrs. Garrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    With Tootie, Blair, Natalie & Jo
    Posts
    845
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    Pete Maravich never made an NCAA tournament.
    Neither did Klay Thompson or Paul George.
    So now Hankins is on par with this group?

  10. #40
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    20,260
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrett View Post
    So now Hankins is on par with this group?
    No way Hanky is in that group.
    Just pointing out NCAA tournament play is not the definition of a successful basketball player.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •