Quote Originally Posted by Masterofreality View Post
Not blaming just fact. Younger players better coached. Loyola younger than Xavier without 4 stars, still more efficient.
Ok, now I get it. When we say, "X didn't have good shooters last year", that's blaming the players, and simply ignores that Steele was the cause of the poor shooting.

But when you say, "Loyola doesn't have as good of players", that just stating the facts, and also means their coach did a great job of coaching these less talented players.

And why do you keep saying Loyola's offense was more efficient when the numbers say otherwise? Please note- the higher the number the better the offense.