We'd all take 8 pts on 4 shots any day of the week. And he doesn't defer, they ignore him, even when he's wide open
Marshall is especially guilty of this. The 3 KyKy hit at Nova was a beautiful shot. He was in the same spot 2 other times and Marshall ignored him. I'm not saying Tandy is Bluiett, but Steele needs to knock some sense into Marshall.
Results 21 to 30 of 134
Thread: New Starting Line-Up?
-
01-02-2020, 05:49 PM #21
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Indy
- Posts
- 3,161
-
01-02-2020, 06:13 PM #22
-
01-03-2020, 08:46 AM #23
Start Leighton Schrand again. Xavier is undefeated with him in the starting lineup, just saying....
"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
-
01-03-2020, 09:02 AM #24
-
01-03-2020, 09:37 AM #25
-
01-03-2020, 09:45 AM #26
-
01-03-2020, 09:54 AM #27
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,469
-
01-03-2020, 10:16 AM #28
-
01-03-2020, 10:26 AM #29
I'd also be fine with him never shooting from 10-15 feet. This offense has looked its best (not a high bar, admittedly) when Naji catches it on the perimeter coming off a curl or screen going immediately downhill. They ran a lot of this against TCU and UC. He's also a good distributor (or has the potential to be) from that spot. I think they'll figure it out to a degree. These are the windows they're looking for when they're running constant dribble handoffs on the perimeter (which seems to piss off a lot of fans).
-
01-03-2020, 10:28 AM #30
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- Montgomery
- Posts
- 790
The interesting thing about Naji is this: if you asked most Xavier fans, what is his best game this year, you would get "UC". 31 and 8, and really took it to Jarron for most of the night. The combative among us could pick another game and provide some nuanced reasons for it, but by and large, the fan base as a whole would say "UC".
He took 11 three's that night. 8 for 11 from two, and 4 for 11 from three.
My point: I think we can all live with him taking threes, especially when he is otherwise attacking and getting into a great rhythm, however, it is the occasional (or more than that) terrible shots that he takes that are so mind-numbing. That step-back three (which looked like it may have actually been a two had it gone in) was just a horrible play.
I guess the summary is my issue with Naji is less about taking three's, and more about general decision making. He is 6'8", skilled, powerful, and athletic, yet it is the 6" between his ears that occasionally holds him / us back.
Bookmarks