Page 4 of 94 FirstFirst ... 234561454 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 931
  1. #31
    Supporting Member murray87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Section 106
    Posts
    531
    This was not the half time score--UVA 48 Syracuse 34. I guess that's old school?
    Veritas vos Liberabit

  2. #32
    Supporting Member xubrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,167
    Quote Originally Posted by murray87 View Post
    This was not the half time score--UVA 48 Syracuse 34. I guess that's old school?
    They say that, but when you look at games from the pre-shot clock era there were actually more possessions per game on average, and more points scored. The 35 second shot clock ere was the slowest the game ever was. Something I learned (I think) from Ken Pomeroy.
    "You can't fix stupid." Ron White

  3. #33
    Supporting Member bjf123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Section 105
    Posts
    5,563
    Quote Originally Posted by murray87 View Post
    This was not the half time score--UVA 48 Syracuse 34. I guess that's old school?
    Ouch. That had to be painful to watch.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Golf is a relatively simple game, played by reasonably intelligent people, stupidly.

  4. #34
    Administrator Muskie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    13,046
    The slate of games tonight is less than stellar.
    "He's a little bit ball-dominant, he needs to have the ball in his hands, and he's not a good shooter." Ball-dominant … isn't that a nice way of calling someone a ball hog? Where is my Jay Bilas Thesaurus?

    Follow XH on Twitter

    Follow XH on Facebook

  5. #35
    Supporting Member noteggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,585
    Quote Originally Posted by xubrew View Post
    They say that, but when you look at games from the pre-shot clock era there were actually more possessions per game on average, and more points scored. The 35 second shot clock ere was the slowest the game ever was. Something I learned (I think) from Ken Pomeroy.
    Interesting, you would thought it would’ve been when they implemented the 45 second clock. Guess some remembered Dean Smith’s four corner offensive. As that type of game was brutal to watch, nothing compares to the 1983 UC UK game I went to. Final score UK 24 - UC 11 and 15 made field goals on 31 attempts.

  6. #36
    Supporting Member xubrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,167
    Quote Originally Posted by noteggs View Post
    Interesting, you would thought it would’ve been when they implemented the 45 second clock. Guess some remembered Dean Smith’s four corner offensive. As that type of game was brutal to watch, nothing compares to the 1983 UC UK game I went to. Final score UK 24 - UC 11 and 15 made field goals on 31 attempts.
    Oh I'm sure there were certainly games and teams that slowed it down to the point of wanting to make people set their heads on fire. As a whole, the general pace was faster. Which is kind of interesting. The only thing I can think of is that before you had 35 seconds to shoot, they saw no point in running the clock down.
    "You can't fix stupid." Ron White

  7. #37
    Supporting Member xubrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,167
    Quote Originally Posted by Muskie View Post
    The slate of games tonight is less than stellar.
    Seattle v Wazzu is kind of interesting. Seattle had a pretty good team last year until they lost seemingly all their starters to injury. They are healthy again this year, and may be good enough to beat a crappy P5 team on the road.

    Actually...what am I saying?? No one really cares about that but me.
    "You can't fix stupid." Ron White

  8. #38
    Administrator Muskie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    13,046
    Quote Originally Posted by xubrew View Post
    Seattle v Wazzu is kind of interesting. Seattle had a pretty good team last year until they lost seemingly all their starters to injury. They are healthy again this year, and may be good enough to beat a crappy P5 team on the road.

    Actually...what am I saying?? No one really cares about that but me.
    Brew, that game is way past my bedtime.
    "He's a little bit ball-dominant, he needs to have the ball in his hands, and he's not a good shooter." Ball-dominant … isn't that a nice way of calling someone a ball hog? Where is my Jay Bilas Thesaurus?

    Follow XH on Twitter

    Follow XH on Facebook

  9. #39
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    34,393
    Quote Originally Posted by xubrew View Post
    Seattle v Wazzu is kind of interesting. Seattle had a pretty good team last year until they lost seemingly all their starters to injury. They are healthy again this year, and may be good enough to beat a crappy P5 team on the road.

    Actually...what am I saying?? No one really cares about that but me.
    I took Seattle +3.5 on your recommendation. I hope that $25 weighs heavily on you if the (whatever Seattle's mascot is) don't cover!

  10. #40
    When just one isnt enough X-band '01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Overlook Hotel
    Posts
    14,643
    Redhawks (formerly Chieftains)

    I have no life to remember things like that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •