Assuming we lose 1 in New York we would need to win just 4 the rest of the way. I think we win another 5-6 games.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Results 31 to 40 of 261
Thread: It sucks to suck
-
01-06-2019, 01:16 PM #31
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 3,063
-
01-06-2019, 02:11 PM #32
Well if we have all these top players then Steele sucks which means we are going to suck for a long time. The good news is he doesn’t suck. However we do suck. It’s okay though bc we will be back next year or the year after next. Makes you appreciate not being a Dayton fan. Could you imagine sucking all
The time? Everything will be fine. Just goes to show you there is a reason our 3 transfers didn’t
Play at high D1 schools.If I was going to school for school, I wouldn’t have picked the University of Cincinnati. Dontonio Wingfield
-
01-06-2019, 08:44 PM #33
-
01-06-2019, 08:47 PM #34
-
01-06-2019, 09:08 PM #35
- Join Date
- Feb 2015
- Posts
- 408
Last edited by Drew; 01-06-2019 at 09:37 PM.
-
01-06-2019, 10:27 PM #36
Temporary setback.
That’s what I keep telling myself about this year.
Not shocking in any way.
-
01-06-2019, 10:56 PM #37
Not sure if there is a link to this piece (which was written after The SH game) posted somewhere else on the board already. I do know it was worth reading. Pretty detailed and spot on- supported by real stats and other objective truths.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ban...ketball-steele
-
01-07-2019, 12:03 AM #38
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
- Posts
- 1,103
Absolutely agree. When I think flagship I think of the first team that comes to mind when you say a conference name... Big East is Nova, Big Ten MSU, ACC Duke, SEC UK and so on. Maybe a little gray area in some conferences like with Indiana or UNC, but that is just my definition.
-
01-07-2019, 11:38 AM #39
We suck. But we sucked the first year of the Chris Mack era, too.
We will be good again. Starting next season.
-
01-07-2019, 12:08 PM #40
Bookmarks