All im really saying is that when you have only one style of play then in this tournament you will face your kryptonite at some point. The teams that advance and go far are the teams that can play multiple styles and adjust. Virginia just can't do that with how they play
Results 51 to 60 of 60
Thread: History is made!!!
-
03-17-2018, 07:15 PM #51
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
- Posts
- 1,103
-
03-17-2018, 07:34 PM #52
South has been blown up
#1 Virginia GONE
#3 Tennessee GONE
#4 Arizona GONE
Now just need Nevada to beat Cincinnati2014 RTS National Champion $200,000 (2460 teams) 2015 RTS 2nd Place $25,000 (3120 teams)
2012 NFFC National Champion $100,000 (1872 teams) 2015/2018 NCAA Bracketology 351/362 pts
-
03-17-2018, 07:37 PM #53
-
03-17-2018, 07:39 PM #54
It make up for the times Kentucky was #1 overall seed and didn't win it or the time Kentucky went 38-0 and didn't win it to win it in a year like this when Kentucky was no where near the best team.
Would prefer a Kentucky vs Xavier National Championship game but hopefully both teams make the Final 4 somehow.2014 RTS National Champion $200,000 (2460 teams) 2015 RTS 2nd Place $25,000 (3120 teams)
2012 NFFC National Champion $100,000 (1872 teams) 2015/2018 NCAA Bracketology 351/362 pts
-
03-17-2018, 08:11 PM #55
-
03-17-2018, 09:13 PM #56
Last edited by Xuperman; 03-17-2018 at 09:22 PM.
President of the Eddie Johnson Fan Club
-
03-17-2018, 09:16 PM #57
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Coxsackie, NY
- Posts
- 332
A little late to this thread but was too drunk to find pants last night much less type. But this whole thing with UMBC is more than incredible and being a Binghamton alum I follow the AEast as well as X/Big East!!! UMBC were picked to finish 3rd in the conference, finished 8th in the conference in rebounding and their OOC conference wins were pitiful. Outside of N. Kentucky the best win was maybe Nichols St? Vermont has basically been steamrolling everyone else in the conference the past few years and just UMBC winning in Burlington was a massive upset albeit on a Lyles three at the buzzer if that surprises anyone. They had a really quiet year in conference and personally I didnt think they'd win a conference tourney game so my mind is totally blown because if there's one team that historically probably shouldn't have blown out a #1 overall seed it's UMBC. Although I say that and have to admit Lyles has been really good and received zero recognition for it in the conference awards and such.
Since I get to post about the AEast here and am feeling sentimental, if anyone is bored and wants a good read check out the Binghamton basketball scandal. Still havent really recovered from that whole mess in 2006 but at the same time I'm surprised we werent kicked out of D1. That team was the only time the program made the dance and had everything. Players fleeing the country, black mailing the school, UNC style fake classes, robbing Walmart of rubbers, etc.......
-
03-18-2018, 07:36 AM #58
Retrievers?
Shouldn't UMBC's nickname be the Cords?Warmly,
"Mel"
-
03-18-2018, 03:23 PM #59
- Join Date
- Dec 2016
- Location
- FL, on the Cape
- Posts
- 1,223
I’m sorry, but no. Your assertion was that the tourney is flawed because it doesn’t always crown the best team, and this premise is wrong. The NCAA has never claimed that its trying to crown the best team, it simply crowns the winner. Given this, it cannot be flawed by failing to accomplish something it isn’t designed to accomplish, i.e. crowning the best team. It is a simple fact that you’re premise is wrong, not my opinion. Can you follow that? The remainder of your assertions are rendered meaningless since they are built off your false premise. Correct your premise, then you can see if your critique holds water. Otherwise you’re only spouting off with drivel.
-
03-18-2018, 07:39 PM #60
Bookmarks