Politics Thread

[bjf123]

This absolutely is selective prosecution, just like the case brought by the State of NY. Does anyone really think Trump is the first, and only, developer to exaggerate the value of property to get more favorable terms from a bank? Is the State looking for others to prosecute for the same thing? Of course not! The only reason for that trial was to hurt Trump. Nothing else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[paulxu]

Great, you’ve identified the issue. Explain/prove how he committed the crime.

It is just you Paul.

You can watch along with me as they introduce the evidence of fabricated "legal fees" to explain paying a porn star through an intermediary in a "catch and kill" scheme to prevent negative press and promote his election. It's been interesting to hear Pecker describe the false negatives they came up with to harm his opponents. I particularly liked the fake photo of Cruz's dad and Lee Harvey Oswald.

Of course, perhaps it's not his signature on the checks.

The jury will have to decide if the prosecution makes its case. That's often how it works. And the grifted are paying for his legal team, and I'm sure he's well represented.

[xuphan]

The problem with hating the other side so much that you just want to torpedo their boat and watch it sink into the ocean is that YOU ARE ON THAT EXACT SAME BOAT!!!! You should't feel good about how all the assholes on the Titanic are going to drown in the ocean if you yourself are also on the Titanic and are also going to drown in the ocean.

Both candidates, especailly Trump, seem to have become the nominee on the grounds that they were the ones that the other side would like the least. Not because they were any good, or that they could be effective leaders, but almost because they WOULDN'T be! They could piss the other side more than anyone else could, and that's what got it for them. And, we are all sinking into the ocean because of it.

GOOD JOB AMERICA!!!

Thank You! A good lesson for our folks on here who seem to side solely left or right.

[Strange Brew]

You can watch along with me as they introduce the evidence of fabricated "legal fees" to explain paying a porn star through an intermediary in a "catch and kill" scheme to prevent negative press and promote his election. It's been interesting to hear Pecker describe the false negatives they came up with to harm his opponents. I particularly liked the fake photo of Cruz's dad and Lee Harvey Oswald.

Of course, perhaps it's not his signature on the checks.

The jury will have to decide if the prosecution makes its case. That's often how it works. And the grifted are paying for his legal team, and I'm sure he's well represented.

Ok, so what is the crime Paul? Is it running a campaign? And how is that a State crime in a Federal election?

[noteggs]

Here we are discussing the minutia of a targeted prosecution. Next thing we’ll be talking about is how the hush money caused Hillary to lose the election.

Meanwhile the East coast campuses are dripping with antisemitism. Someone inform the legacy media.

[Strange Brew]

Here we are discussing the minutia of a targeted prosecution. Next thing we’ll be talking about is how the hush money caused Hillary to lose the election.

Meanwhile the East coast campuses are dripping with antisemitism. Someone inform the legacy media.

Haha, true.

Hey Paul/Bobbie, can we get something done on the border now that Biden got his Ukraine bill?

[bobbiemcgee]

Sure, the bipartisan bill is sitting on Johnson:S desk. Tell him to put it om the floor

[Strange Brew]

Sure, the bipartisan bill is sitting on Johnson:S desk. Tell him to put it om the floor

The stand alone bill is still sitting on Chuck’s desk.

It’s his move.

[bobbiemcgee]

No, spending bills start in the house.

[paulxu]

Ok, so what is the crime Paul? Is it running a campaign? And how is that a State crime in a Federal election?

Please read the New York State statute I noted earlier.