Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Senior Cheesehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    West Chester, Ohio
    Posts
    6,043

    Nova Loses Omari Spellman for year

    The NCAA has ruled Villanova freshman Omari Spellman ineligible for the 2016-17 season.

    Spellman will sit out the season as an academic redshirt and have four seasons of eligibility remaining.

    According to Villanova's announcement, the NCAA determined that Spellman did not complete his initial eligibility requirements in time. Spellman was a fifth-year high school senior last season.

    "We are extremely disappointed for Omari," coach Jay Wright said in a statement. "While we don't agree with the NCAA's decision, we are members of the association and respect it. We understand why the NCAA felt it had to rule this way.

    "We will make a positive out of this for Omari. He will concentrate on his academics and individual development this season. In the long run, Omari will be a better student and player for this experience."

    Spellman, a 6-foot-9 power forward from St. Thomas More School in Connecticut, was ranked No. 18 and considered a five-star prospect in the 2016 class.

    Without Spellman, Wright will rely more on senior forward Darryl Reynolds and freshman big men Tim Delaney and Dylan Painter.

    Wright and athletic director Mark Jackson, who met with the media alongside Spellman on Friday afternoon, said the issue was when Spellman's freshman year of high school began.

    Spellman enrolled at Middletown High School, a public school in New York, as a freshman but stayed just two months before transferring to the Hoosac School, a private school also in New York. At the private school's recommendation, Wright said, Spellman enrolled at Hoosac as an eighth-grader. Wright said the decision to change grades was for academics, not athletics.

    An NCAA source explained to ESPN.com that Spellman got caught up in what is referred to as the core course timetable limitation. By NCAA rule, once an athlete begins his freshman year of high school, he then has four years to complete his 16 core courses. Spellman did complete his coursework, but by dropping back to the eighth grade he essentially took longer than the allowable four years. Though he did not even finish a semester as a ninth-grader at Middletown, the time there counted and started his eligibility clock.

    Because he ultimately completed all 16 core courses in good standing he is considered an academic redshirt, under an NCAA distinction just going into practice this year. Spellman can enroll at Villanova, practice with the Wildcats and sit on the bench during home games.

    "Once he started his freshman year, his clock started,'' Wright said. "So we get it. We know the rule. We understand the process. We don't necessarily agree with the decision, but we accept it. We just want to move on in a positive way.''




    Wright said the Villanova athletic staff noticed the discrepancy immediately upon recruiting Spellman and brought it to the NCAA's attention, beginning the lengthy and laborious appeals process. The university, he said, worked with the eligibility center, the initial eligibility waiver committee and even appealed to Oliver Luck, the NCAA's vice president of regulatory affairs. The school also hired an outside consulting firm to help with the appeal.

    But the appeal was denied multiple times.

    "After the first appeal, when that was denied, I broke down in tears,'' Spellman said. "I didn't know how to handle it. Two days ago when they told me again [that the final appeal was denied], it was hard but it was more manageable. I'm going to turn it into a positive. Life goes on and I'm just going to keep on working.''

    Information from ESPN's Dana O'Neil was used in this report.
    Zip'em Up!

  2. #2
    When just one isnt enough X-band '01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Overlook Hotel
    Posts
    14,659
    It does hurt for Villanova given that Spellman did complete all his core courses (albeit in a 5-year timespan), but at least he will have 4 seasons of eligibility in front of him.

    Is this the first year they've used the term "academic redshirt" for situations like this one?

  3. #3
    Sophomore mohr5150's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,115
    I have to say this is utter BS by the NCAA. The kid finished what he needed to finish. If it took him an extra year, who the hell cares.

  4. #4
    When just one isnt enough X-band '01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Overlook Hotel
    Posts
    14,659
    I would have called it BS had he been docked a year of eligibility like a non-qualifier. I do see the logic of giving him time to acclimate to college academics and at least allowing him to practice and sit with his team during games this year.

  5. #5
    I agree with this, basically the NCAA is saying that a 5 year HS student now becomes a 5 year college student.

    Quote Originally Posted by mohr5150 View Post
    I have to say this is utter BS by the NCAA. The kid finished what he needed to finish. If it took him an extra year, who the hell cares.

  6. #6
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    34,417
    So basically Spellman will be a top 5 pick in the '17 draft without ever playing a minute of college basketball? Sucks big time for Nova.

  7. #7
    Let's say he plays 4 years at 'Nova, he was a 5 year HS student so he will arrive at 19 years old. He won't play until he is 20, so basically he will be Myles and Jalen.

  8. #8
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    20,337
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheesehead View Post
    An NCAA source explained to ESPN.com that Spellman got caught up in what is referred to as the core course timetable limitation. By NCAA rule, once an athlete begins his freshman year of high school, he then has four years to complete his 16 core courses. .
    That shows you just out of touch I am with all this. I thought there were all kinds of kids who went to 4 years of HS, then weren't quite over the hump academically, so they went off to prep school for a year...essentially taking 5 years to finish HS. Guess they were all in prep school in their 4th year.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  9. #9
    All-Conference XUFan09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    7,064

    Nova Loses Omari Spellman for year

    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    That shows you just out of touch I am with all this. I thought there were all kinds of kids who went to 4 years of HS, then weren't quite over the hump academically, so they went off to prep school for a year...essentially taking 5 years to finish HS. Guess they were all in prep school in their 4th year.
    I think they graduated after 4 years but then went to a prep school for a year to take care of other requirements.

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    That shows you just out of touch I am with all this. I thought there were all kinds of kids who went to 4 years of HS, then weren't quite over the hump academically, so they went off to prep school for a year...essentially taking 5 years to finish HS. Guess they were all in prep school in their 4th year.
    Obviously I am biased.... so lets get that out of the way.

    1. The crazy thing is the rule (complete the core hs courses in 4 years) was instituted after he started high school-shouldnt there be a grandfathered approach here?

    2. He started public high school and after he transferred to a private school 2 months later for what they say was academics, the school recommended to the family he go back to 8th grade to get caught up. So the ncaa says the clock started with that first publuc school even though it was for academic reasons.

    3. Nova became aware of it in the recruiting process and SELF REPORTED that this might need to be looked at to the letter of their rule.

    It just smacks of nonsense and lack of common sense. Again, i fully acknowledge bias. The shame of it is he wont play with Hart which changes Hart's role back to rebounding and less leaking out (which would have help him more at the next level). Anyway, i still think we are pretty good and challenge for anything.

    If Spellman does play next year and does not go pro, we can look at it as Samuels 4*, Crosbee Roundtree 4*, Spellman 5* and hopefully either walker 5* and or morsell 4* as the class to replace hart jenkins and reynolds.

    There is however a pretty pissed off fan base as to the lack of commin sense on this one. Hell, even jay bilas thinks its ridiculous!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •