Results 371 to 373 of 373
Thread: Cincinnati to the Big 12?
-
10-18-2016, 07:42 PM #371
-
10-19-2016, 07:00 AM #372
-
10-19-2016, 11:39 AM #373
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Indianapolis, IN
- Posts
- 938
My worry: people think this is the best way for the consumer but I am not so sure. Right now, streaming and "content-driven subscription" models have to maintain their competitiveness with a lower rate due to the ease and high number of people with the traditional cable set up that they need to compete with. Once everything goes to a subscription based model, what's to keep the popular ones (ESPN, FOX, HBO, CBS, NBC, etc.) from raising prices to the point that to watch more than a couple you will be paying as much as you did for full cable subscriptions? I guess you could say the competition in the market, but I have read some arguments that claim the subscription based model will actually be more expensive (less valuable?) for consumers because the full cable packages have to subsidize the less popular with the more popular, so you get more content for less money in the long run.
It will be interesting, and maybe people are alright with paying slightly less or almost as much for more targeted content, but I don't think this is the slam dunk everyone acts like it is. It also doesn't help that I have a wide array of interests so I am one of the few who take advantage of a full cable subscription.
Bookmarks