I mean, both witnesses have already denied it right? And she's already said she can't remember the exact date or location, so an investigation is practically impossible.
Printable View
Check that. All 4 witnesses she's named have now denied it. The female classmate says she wasn't there and doesn't even know Kavanaugh.
https://discourse-cdn-sjc1.com/gamek...40817a3175.gif
We can all at least agree that this type of behavior isn't ok right...right?
https://twitter.com/evanperez/status...194718208?s=21Quote:
New witness. "Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford."
The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford's.
Not quite sure the point you’re trying to make. Those two statements are mutually exclusive. I will say that the definition of sexual assault has changed over the years. 30 years ago, a wolf whistle or pat on the rear were seen as the guy being a jerk. Today, those are considered a sexual assault.
In today’s society, you can have consensual sex with someone and, after the fact, the other person can decide it was a mistake and claim a sexual assault or rape. I’m sorry, but that’s wrong.
Don’t know if you live in Cincinnati now, but former county prosecutor, Mike Allen, now a criminal defense attorney, has filed multiple lawsuits against local schools where the male student was suspended or expelled in that scenario. That would be the fear I’d have if I had a college aged son.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The point I'm trying to make is not that they're mutually exclusive, but that your view is clearly inconsistent and being bent when convenient. In this discussion you've managed to say that sexual assault shouldn't preclude Kavanaugh basically because everyone was doing it. However, not enough people are doing it today to make someone more afraid of sexual assault for a daughter than they are of wrongful allegations against a son.
I think what you're referring to as "in today's society", is just college campuses. Which is a problem, but no where near the scale of sexual assault on campuses. These schools rightfully have had the pants sued off of them. Not that comparing the two is useful or worthwhile in anyway whatsoever. They are both bad and one does not diminish the other.
This is the kind of crap I'm talking about when I say I'm fearful for my son....this kind of stuff is complete bs...such a good catholic girl getting blitzed out of her mind at a college frat house does something she feels guilty doing so starts blaming someone. I heard about this kind of crap happen in college when a girl would get drunk underage, do something with consent but then next morning feel guilty about it, and oh the guy tricked me etc.