Covid-19

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

08-05-2022, 12:43 PM
XU_Lou

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xville

Pot meet kettle. This is the difference between raw data and statistical analysis, something you still are unwilling to grasp. You and your buddy mid believe that by looking at some raw data in one specific area of one country that coincides with your beliefs, means you have found some holy grail and can point fingers at the entire health community and msm and say “see I’m right and you’re wrong,” and pat yourselves on the back. It’s mind bogglingly ignorant.

Good God, are you really that fucking stupid? Summarized governments reports are not raw data. The fact that you don't understand that fundamental point proves you don't have a clue about anything related to stats.
08-05-2022, 12:47 PM
XU_Lou

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xville

Pot meet kettle. This is the difference between raw data and statistical analysis, something you still are unwilling to grasp. You and your buddy mid believe that by looking at some raw data in one specific area of one country that coincides with your beliefs, means you have found some holy grail and can point fingers at the entire health community and msm and say “see I’m right and you’re wrong,” and pat yourselves on the back. It’s mind bogglingly ignorant.

Reading comprehension, memory loss, laziness, willful ignorance or just plain lying once again? You may recall we've reported data from several states and countries that all showed basically the same trends.
08-05-2022, 12:51 PM
Xville

Quote:

Originally Posted by XU_Lou

Good God, are you really that fucking stupid? Summarized governments reports are not raw data. The fact that you don't understand that fundamental point proves you don't have a clue about anything related to stats.

Yet somehow you still just look at the raw data and come to your own conclusion about it that follows your belief system and ignore the analysis behind it. Then, when that is pointed out to you and you realize you are wrong, you resort to just calling them libs. Weird
08-05-2022, 12:53 PM
Xville

Quote:

Originally Posted by XU_Lou

Reading comprehension, memory loss, laziness, willful ignorance or just plain lying once again? You may recall we've reported data from several states and countries that all showed basically the same trends.

Yes… raw data points without the context and analysis behind it. You still don’t seem to grasp that part.
08-05-2022, 01:01 PM
XU_Lou

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xville

Yet somehow you still just look at the raw data and come to your own conclusion about it that follows your belief system and ignore the analysis behind it. Then, when that is pointed out to you and you realize you are wrong, you resort to just calling them libs. Weird

I guess you also ignored my comments on the data yesterday and over the last 2 years as well. How convenient of you to misrepresent that once again. Do you ever stop lying?

You can argue and lie all you want until you're blue in the face, but you dug a hole you'll never climb out of with regards to your definition of raw data.
08-05-2022, 01:06 PM
Xville

Quote:

Originally Posted by XU_Lou

I guess you also ignored my comments on the data yesterday and over the last 2 years as well. How convenient of you to misrepresent that once again. Do you ever stop lying?

You can argue and lie all you want until you're blue in the face, but you dug a hole you'll never climb out of with regards to your definition of raw data.

What do you think my definition of raw data is? I never defined it, but ok.

Also, what comments? The ones in which you extracted some data points and then came up with your own aha gotcha moment that I said you have been doing all along?
08-08-2022, 09:57 AM
Xuperman

Ok, now that the dust has settled from that exhausting barrage of argumentative artillery, can we ALL agree -

The predicted 92% effectiveness for the 2 shot "vaccines" in PREVENTING Covid infection was a blatant lie?

The Covid "vaccines" do not prevent contracting Covid?

The CONSTANT Fauci led "safe and effective" selling point is completely incorrect?

That the drug companies were allowed to disregard the FDA 8-10 year testing criteria in exchange for legal immunity from ANY law suits?

That the CDC had to alter their official definition of "vaccine" to avoid using the accurate word "shot" in their promotion of these drugs?

That a 3rd, 4th, 5th booster does nothing to reduce the chances of contracting or transmitting Covid?

That generic blue masks or cloth masks have zero chance of effectively preventing spread?

That there is absolutely no way to know what long term side effects are possible?

If their is any disagreement in the above let's hear it. Otherwise, shouldn't the constant push to "jab and re-jab" more of the population with these untested drugs come to an end?
08-08-2022, 10:08 AM
Xville

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xuperman

Ok, now that the dust has settled from that exhausting series of argumentative artillery, can we ALL agree -

The predicted 92% effectiveness for the 2 shot "vaccines" in PREVENTING Covid infection was a blatant lie? It was misleading but that’s what was thought at the time. Things changed obviously

The Covid "vaccines" do not prevent contracting Covid? Prevent, no but may reduce

The CONSTANT Fauci led "safe and effective" selling point is completely incorrect? No, that’s correct. There are of course risks with everything in life.

That the drug companies were allowed to disregard the FDA 8-10 year testing criteria in exchange for legal immunity from ANY law suits? Yeah that’s kind of how life works.

That the CDC had to alter their official definition of "vaccine" to avoid using the accurate word "shot" in their promotion of these drugs? Not really true

That a 3rd, 4th, 5th booster does nothing to reduce the chances of contracting or transmitting Covid? Nothing is not correct.

That generic blue masks or cloth mask have zero chance of effectively preventing spread? 0 is probably not correct.

That there is absolutely no way to know what long term side effects are possible? True but no other vaccine has to my knowledge. And again if I can avoid going to the hospital or dying from Covid, I’ll go ahead and get an annual shot, just like other vaccines.

If their is any disagreement in the above let's hear it. Otherwise, shouldn't the constant push to "jab and re-jab" more of the population with these untested drugs come to an end?

answers above
08-08-2022, 10:13 AM
GoMuskies

I got the first two shots and a booster, but I'm probably done with Covid shots. Curious where others are. I've never gotten a flu shot, and I don't plan to get an annual Covid shot. Perhaps as I get a bit older (45 now).
08-08-2022, 10:36 AM
Xuperman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xville

answers above

Nitpicking a few words? Anyone can see where I'm coming from, but something tells me you're a "No" regardless.

So, if you contracted Covid and didn't have to be admitted to the hospital or die, you would be thanking the Lord for Trump's "vaccine"?

Also, do you now think that any of these untested drugs can actually PREVENT contracting Covid?

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page