A much larger sample is needed before we can truly make judgements on NIL. We will see if this is still accurate over the next 5 or so years.
Printable View
You think a football school like bama is spending a lot of their nil on basketball?
Ya think nc state pays more in nil or duke/unc? I mean come on pretty common sense with the first two.
Rumor is that UConn is in line with most of the other big East in the 2-3 mil range.
Purdue I have no idea. I know edey reportedly makes quite a bit. Outside of that, no idea
For sure. Thought the same thing with FAU and SDST last year. Probably just spending more than everyone else. But IF we say that Alabama, Purdue and NC State just spent the most- then that’s great. NIL created three teams that haven’t that haven’t been to the final four in 30+ years. An opportunity they otherwise wouldn’t have had. That’s awesome
To be clear my argument is not that the teams that spend the most will be most talented.I’m guessing they will. Which is no different than it’s ever been...I think it ends up creating more parity. Players will stay in college longer (vs going oversees) which creates more talent spread around. Different ways you can build teams and be successful.
I’d be curious to see a stretch of pre NIL where you had a final four of 4 seed, with the rest being worse- followed by a year with 3 programs that haven’t been in over 30 years. So far, NIL hasn’t hurt the ability to be successful…..at all.
Saw on another board that this is the second straight Final Four without a McDonalds All-American.
Seems like the transfer portal and NIL have kind of made the college system go haywire, and it's going to take a bit of time for some order to be restored. But for now the best high school players aren't ending up on the best college teams.
I get your point but not exactly. A 5 star McDonald All American.
https://athlonsports.com/college-bas...ransfer-portal