they're more than happy to let us do it for them. netanyahu already denounced the attack. great ally
Printable View
Ok. Won’t even pretend to know a lot about Middle East politics. I was always of the opinion, based on what little I have read, that the US for decades has held Israel back from being more aggressive against its enemies in the region.
Regardless, get out and let Israel take care of its business in the region. Because, unless I’m wrong again, Israel can take care of business in the Middle East.
I'm not sure that Israel can take on the entire Arab world. Israel has a population of around 8MM people. Iran has 80MM. Iraq 40MM. Saudi Arabia 32MM. I believe that Israel has a technically superior military, but I'm not sure if it's superior enough to take on multiple countries that are so much larger. Was protection of Israel one of the reasons we have been involved in the Middle East? That and Oil, of course.
Obviously in a perfect world we would never have gotten involved, but we did. I'm not really sure what happens when / if we pull out. It will very likely create a power vacuum that could end up getting filled with someone like Russia. I'm not sure we want them controlling that much of the world's oil.
This shit all sounds really simple, but I'm willing to bet it's not, and that's why multiple administrations with pretty different views on most topics have struggled to fine a way to exit. It will be a pleasant surprise if the pack of morons we have in the White House now are the ones who actually figure it out.
Israel is one of them, but definitely not the primary reason. There's little link to them in the Gulf War or the Iraq War as well as Afghanistan.
It's impossible to reduce the complication of the region, but I would say it's mostly explained as an extension of the Cold War and of course we're motivated by oil. We've gained a lot of protection with new oil sources but based on reserves its either be involved in Venezuela or the Middle East.