Could be, but more likely it’s seasonality. I’d say we’ll find out, but with the vaccine rolling out, hopefully we won’t!
Printable View
I really like the individual states doing their own thing because it gives us a good blueprint on what went well. The next people in line for the vaccine in Ohio and Kentucky is a real head scratcher for me as well. Vaccinate the teachers next? Cough, cough union pressure.
To your comment more than 80% of the deaths come from people are over 65. Thought we were supposed to follow the science. Of course this is one of the demands to get the schools open.
Biggest question I have - how is this going to actually protect the students? Yes, you’ll have roughly 4 people per classroom who probably will not spread the virus which is a good thing.
This still doesn’t stamp out kid to kid transmission. Students probably account for roughly 85% of the people in the schools. So, this doesn’t eliminate the children bringing the virus back to Grandma. Here’s a novel idea Governor DeWine, why don’t we just vaccinate Grandma and open up the schools? Oh well, at least my daughter is next in line.
Question: Who should be last in line to receive the vaccine?
Someone has to be last right. Someone mentioned to me that if it is safe enough for athletes to play sports(college and pro) since they have a system already set up for them with excessive testing and monitoring etc. and they happen to be in the most positive age group to combat the virus then they should be last on the list. What do you say?
noteggs- Agree with you, was more or less complaining about Ohio’s slow response. Two weeks feels like a lifetime... I think some states are doing a better job than others for sure. Ohio just seems very slow to me when compared to neighboring states and what colleagues are saying. Perhaps we will know more when the first wave gets 2nd dose. If states that are more liberal in their distribution (Florida, California, etc) don’t have enough for a second dose then that would be a problem.
Madxster- children are last. We are several months away (maybe even over a year?) from young children in the population receiving this. Which is ok I think.
I’m not arguing one way or the other beyond saying all that want the vaccination need to have it available ASAP.
We had dinner with some old friends tonight. She used to be a teacher in a school for the gifted (mostly affluent), but after retiring went back to work at a private school catering to underprivileged kids (and some are indeed gifted as well). She’s in the zip code with the highest positive rates in the area with these kids, and she’s just sure she’s going to get a positive test. She’s in her 60’s, and she cares for her mother with Alzheimer’s. She is VERY upset she cannot get the vaccination. It’s not just union pressure, she is upset and concerned. She is practically a volunteer at this place.
This is tricky stuff. My sister, her husband and a niece are/were all teachers. I don’t know where they are on the list, but I’d put them a little higher than some others might, depending upon circumstances. Each case is different, so it’s hard to make firm guidelines. Again, I have no great answers.
I completely agree we should give the vaccine to those who want it and fill badly for those who cannot. It flat out sucks. Unfortunately when I heard about rollouts, I just knew this was going to be the next political football.
As stated earlier, we should be making concrete scientific reasons on what we know until the vaccine is readily available without pressure and emotional appeals. I completely can’t blame the unions because that is there job to protect the teachers. However IMHO, for them to say we can “now” open schools in a safe manner is a bit disingenuous. Most people would just see this as making sense without digging further.
I know you said you weren’t arguing the fact, but just wanted to clarify my point of view. Side note, sounds like your family is made up a lot like mine, bunch of teachers and healthcare providers. Sure we had a few who strayed from the path lol.