As to your prior post, sorry, Lloyd. I didn't I didn't see anything to respond to. So my response is "OK". I have nothing else to add.
False negatives are not a bigger problem than false positives - not even close. Let me know if you need me to present the math again.
As to the death overcount, the best way to estimate CV19 deaths, is to start with total 2020 excess deaths, all causes. Then subtract estimated year-over-year increase due to aging population. Then subtract deaths caused by lockdowns (suicide, OD, lack of proper medical care, etc.). These numbers could be debated for hours, as they are estimates of estimates, but I am confident it's well under 200k.
You summarize my points well, but I don't believe masks are ineffective. They are minimally effective. There's too much practical evidence to believe they are more than that. Wear them when in public, indoors, and around people for more than a few minutes. I do.
My argument? I guess I feel an obligation to illuminate that the metrics being used to drive policy (#cases, #deaths, test accuracy, positivity rate) are not absolutes. Not by a long-shot, and need to be understood in the proper context. Taking these at face value is causing very bad policy decisions, that will ultimately hurt society much more than they help.
The virus cannot be stopped - not by shutdowns, not by masks, or perhaps even by a vaccine. We need to accept that. But the good news is it is not nearly as bad as it's been made out to be, and it can be managed. Practice common sense hygiene, self isolate with symptoms, protect the vulnerable (as a society), and otherwise live our lives - 100%. This will meet the original goal of preventing hospitals from exceeding capacity, while minimizing overall deaths and minimizing collateral social damage. In short, it's for the greatest common good. That has been my argument since May.