I am 100% willing to take that privilege away from the rich. Glad we're on the same page.
Printable View
I don't know what this means. Are you drawing an equivalency between the likelihood of the event, or the severity? Either one is indefensible, in my opinion. Actual sexual assault happens far more frequently than false accusations, and I would have to imagine that a woman actually being sexually assaulted is far worse than a man being wrongly accused.
Except, personal responsibility aka abstinence just doesn’t work and it has proven time and time again to fail just like trickle down economics.
Contraception works, education works, ban abortion and we regress into a theocracy we fear.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We already outlaw killing. We must already live in a theocracy.
Science says otherwise and so does the supreme court. It really annoys me when people scream for our political leaders to find common ground yet won't cede to common ground on this topic. I will, I agree with a ban past 20-4 weeks except for extreme medical reasons. This would align us with the rest of the civilized world.
Back alley, abortion panels, identifying women as baby makers, this is not way to regress. We need to move in a forward direction and keep the decision between a woman/spouse/partner and her doctor. You don't need to force your choice on someone else, that is vanity. I would never advise that route, but I also don't have the gall to think my choice is the best for 330M Americans. Let's remember, the same anti-abortion people also agree with an amendment to define marriage between a man or woman. Theocracies are all bad, except when it's your religion making the rules.