Soooooo, where is the Warming?

That's definitely true for some of those guys. Not sure why you'd want to be like them.

Anyway, back to politics thread. Car sez it's 110.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee

Anyway, back to politics thread. Car sez it's 110.

---

And you get snow in Denver in May…

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by drudy23

There's no point in reading articles, watching the news or listening to "experts". Everything is nothing but a contradiction. All type of media is used to manipulate and influence.

I literally read 4 articles on the Russia/Ukraine war. 1 said Ukraine already won the war, 1 said they were winning, 1 said Russia had won the war, and the final said Russia had the war won 6 months ago. It's like this everyday with hundreds of topics.

I choose me.

---

Amen to your first paragraph. It’s hysterical how one side thinks they are completely different than the other. It’s all the same cesspool. People like Tucker and Rachel are probably best buddies in real life laughing all the way to the bank.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MADXSTER

Don't know how to look it up. Saw that forest fires in America from 2013 thru 2019 release 3 times more CO2 than Americans in the same time span.

---

96% of carbon dioxide emissions are from natural sources (fire, volcanic eruptions, organic matter decomposition).

The carbon capture and storage grift is going to be a fun, profitable one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xeus

I didn’t just see his name before disregarding the article. I read about him. I took note of the “facts not opinion” claim in the title of a clear opinion piece. I read the article (which opens with “By Joe Hoff” despite the “guest author”)

The reason I replied to Louis is because he posted that like it settled the whole debate. Like he just won with a clear and compelling scientific argument debunking the climate crisis. Just found it funny.

And by the way - since you mentioned it - I look at the source first, before spending any time on the merits. If it’s not worth taking on point by point because the source is crap, or merely opinion, why bother? The article is clearly opinion, and, in my view, from a suspect source.

---

The graphs presented data. Data are not opinion. You are free to argue the data interpretation or present other data, but this is weak.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee

Ditto for you righties. Half of the right still thinks trump won. Ridiculous.

---

Do you realize the majority of us are in the middle, and we think the loud extremists sound silly? I’m not picking on you personally, but I’m picking on the 20%+/- that inhabits either extreme.

The rest of us stay pretty quiet.

Thank God we have such virtuous people on this board....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee

Anyway, back to politics thread. Car sez it's 110.

---

Not anywhere in CO today.