Printable View
Yes. The stakes are important in the election. Some people will face positive or negative consequences based on how the election goes in November. But either way, we're going to have another election in 2028, and we're going to elect someone not named Trump or Biden. And the country will generally be okay either way even though some people will lose their minds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
And here are several examples of your unhinged vitriol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
This is only a recent sampling. It goes on and on and on. You're as complicit as just about anyone in this country for the lack of civility in public discourse.
So please, spare us your holier-than-thou "we need civility" preaching nonsense. You have a complete lack of self-awareness....
If you appoint your own judges, you can get whatever you want.
Immunity for illegal acts? No problem.
Steal state secrets ? No problem.
Blow job or non-existent land deal ? BIG problem.
What a joke.
lol. Yeah I think he's a complete POS and followers, or should I say disciples of him like yourself, need help. However, I don't think him being elected is a threat to democracy. Both things can be true, I know that's hard for you to digest.Quote:
Originally Posted by XU_Lou
I do love the overarching "You're as complicit as just about anyone in this country for the lack of civility in public discourse" though. I mean I like Xavierhoops as much as the next guy, and thank you to Muskie for having this board, but you may be overinflating the power and reach of this messageboard just a touch. lol.
Of Course! Do you really think these judges make decisions based on the constitution or their political party? They are the same as any politician out there. What good for the party over what’s good for the country. You would also admit this would happen if Obama or Biden nominated judges to the court? Those judges would put liberal views ahead of the constitution. The proof is in the voting. They vote for their party over the country.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
Hunter Biden was prosecuted by a special counsel. Wonder if his conviction will be thrown out on appeal?
(I'm guessing Cannon's ruling will not stand)
Cry harder, Paul.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
You've been thumping your chest on this board, touting the US Justice system in how they have been handling Trump's arrests and prosecution. A ruling goes in his favor and now you want to poke holes? Sounds like you only support our system of justice when rulings align with your world view. Incredibly weak.
Let me speak a little slower for you, Boner Champ, since the point obviously flew over your head:Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
You don't like Trump because of his acerbic personality, but you're exactly like him. I could say there's no difference, but you're actually far worse than Trump. You can't handle anyone who disagrees with you. Instead of engaging in a debate and presenting facts to support your argument, your first and only instinct is to attack.
Honestly, I can't figure out if you're just a spoiled brat, or a legitimate psycho.
I do see the colorful nickname is back. It's rich calling me a spoiled brat or psycho..coming from someone who denies talking about me in a post when it was very clear you were.Quote:
Originally Posted by XU_Lou
Also, extremely rich whining about "presenting facts" when your posts are full of rhetoric blaming one side of the political aisle for everything.
Ya see, I do present facts, a lot actually, (such as the ivermectin "debate") and then people like yourself and MID move the goalposts such as in your very last post.
HmmmQuote:
Originally Posted by XU_Lou