Printable View
That is manifestly false. The IPCC reports continue to offer nuanced guidance, providing both forecast and forecast range because, as they readily admit, it is an inexact science with limited data to draw from. But certainly the pattern of weather events, global temperature changes, ocean temperature change, and sea ice melt seems consistent with what the IPCC reports have been saying for the last 20+ years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterofreality
Virginia charging new 'highway use fee' to fuel-efficient vehicle drivers
https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...icient-vehicle
I swear Democrats would tax the air we breathe if they could find a way to put a meter on everyone's face.
:jawdrop2:::jawdrop2:Quote:
Originally Posted by X Factor
Your supply of far right leaning BS articles is endless and tiring... do you have all these sites bookmarked for daily reading or something?Quote:
Originally Posted by X Factor
This is not a new concept and not unique to Democrats. Fees for electric/hybrid cars have been around awhile. Here is some data, and you can see many of these states have Republicans in charge:
https://www.ncsl.org/research/energy...-vehicles.aspx
What in that article is far right and BS? Looks like a bunch of quotes and pretty straight reporting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Braun
Details are accurate but presented with bias... and then posted with more bias. This happens everywhere and is not something exclusive to DemocratsQuote:
Originally Posted by Smails
That article came out before Ohio also added additional charges for fuel-efficient cars back in 2019. I think it was also part of the same package where Ohio no longer made it mandatory to have a front license plate.
In reality, it's not unfair to do that when the gas tax is more heavily tilted towards cars that aren't as fuel-efficient.
Posted with bias?...ummm that would be every post here. Are you railing against message boards? It's okay just to say that you were wrong when you went after the original poster. It was not a far right BS articleQuote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Braun
I would say presenting half the facts is BS yes. The intent of the post was to say that Democrats are taxing people unnecessarily and the article linked implies the same thing, that the “Democrat-controlled” congress passed this tax. Which is true, but it’s also true that many other Republican-controlled states, including Ohio, have done the exact same thing. I feel that’s a pertinent fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smails
We have to pay for stuff somehow, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by X Factor