Wait. Roger Stone is not a convicted felon pardoned by the president? I'm sure I read that somewhere.
Printable View
I didn't know that question was asked directly to me...which it wasn't, but I'll answer. I'd call it dirty politics, also known as today's political climate. No different than the Dems using a foreign operator (Soros) to funnel billions of foreign money into Dem causes and candidates during election cycles.
Now you're on record of saying that the Russians colluded and influenced an election. If that's your position, I'll for the THIRD time ask: Do you consider the election tainted or illegitimate because of this collusion that you have defined?
Crickets....
Neither the resident racist nor the propagandist can offer even one rebuttal to:
* The Durham report quotes regarding Obama's roll in making-up the Russia collusion hoax story out of thin air.
* Nor the report quoted by Stone that was published in the The Nation - the bible for leftists - that "the theft of the DNC e-mails was not a hack, but some kind of inside leak that did not involve Russia": https://www.thenation.com/article/ar...ears-dnc-hack/ >>> I'm quite certain the propagandist knew all this long ago, but continues to this day to peddle lies as if we're all stupid (the racist is just too damn lazy to do any research on his own).
* The testimony by CrowdStrike Chief Security Officer Shawn Henry - under oath to the House Intelligence Committee - admitted that the report contained no proof whatsoever that the Russians hacked the DNC, or obtained the embarrassing chain of e-mails published by WikiLeaks.
But go ahead guys, keep barking....
Certainly tainted by the activities of the Trump campaign people in meeting with Russian intelligence operatives.
I don't think we'll ever know if it's "illegitimate" as it would not seem possible to measure the voting impact in numbers that the leaks and other coordination might have caused.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...16-us-election