Heads up, Juice is going to question you on the term "assault rifles" next. Good luck.
Printable View
A device shooting 450 rounds in a few minutes rendering a substantial structure uninhabitable may qualify.
https://www.theonion.com/nation-to-w...ore-1820186609
I don't know and I don't care about the semantics and straw men anymore. And I actually disagree with your "shouldn't we..." sentence. I've gotten to the point where I think intervening now and then figuring out the right way for guns to exist in our society is the best course of action. The status quo isn't working. I'd rather the government try something rather than sitting on its hands waiting for the reality to not be the reality.Quote:
We all need to take a deep breath, gather as much information as we can, and then sit with our hands folded indefinitely.
I actually like to know what something is and how it works or the differences between it and similar devices are before I suggest banning it.
The media constantly shoves incorrect information to the public on firearms and none of them know what the hell they're talking about so you guys parrot the same bullshit.
You know how this shooting or Dylan Roof could have been avoided? The Air Force could have entered the Texas shooter's DV conviction into the database and the FBI could have responded on the background check of Dylan Roof. Roof was prohibited from buying/owning a firearm because of his prior drug conviction. Rules/Laws are in place that would have prevented these shootings but the federal government f*cked up. Now you want that same federal government to "just do something"?