Printable View
Except that 1) You were negligent 2)It was no accident.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
The matter does NOT speak for itself because you changed the definition.
Once again trying to slickly defer out of answering my previous points by quoting in a different language.
I took Latin too.
Yeah, I saw that. But..it had already been pointed out to you in 16032 that he was not a co-founder....then you repeated the lie again in 16033. Then you decided to come clean about your lie in 16035. You're a pretty well-read guy, so you obviously knew he wasn't a co-founder before you put that lie out there. Don't ask people to have reasonable discussions if you're going to knowingly spread a lie or blatant misrepresentation.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
I continued to misread the Business Insider article in my second post.
I realized my mistake, and acknowledged it.
Sorry about the misunderstanding. What more would you like me to say?
Musk gives "commitment' to free speech talk", then bans a bunch of journalists.
"journalists"
Weird - MSM is all over the “journalists” suspension story for doxing, but crickets for conservative suppression revelations.
Hey Boobie...if you don't like his rules, then go buy or start your own libtard social platform.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee
Can't I just wait to buy his from the bankruptcy trustee? Seems way more efficient and avoids having to do those pesky things like learn how to code.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamont Sanford
Are we talking about Twitter or WaPo?Quote:
Originally Posted by STL_XUfan
What rules? Says he's for "free speech" but isn't. Liar.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamont Sanford