Yeah, good luck getting 67 Senators to vote. But if it did happen, the racists would have Harris as Pres. HahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Masterofreality
Printable View
Yeah, good luck getting 67 Senators to vote. But if it did happen, the racists would have Harris as Pres. HahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Masterofreality
Everybody would.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee
Crickets?Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
I’m done dealing with the yapping above. I posted an answer. You can’t argue with stupid and apparently stupid can’t read.
Instead Ima just gonna keep posting Biden’s foibles, and there are many.
If you wanna know why gas prices are insane and going higher, this repost explains it.
And nice job Brandon of begging to Venezuela for energy. This admin is a dumpster fire
https://michaelshellenberger.substac...opec-backfires
I fail to find where you answered the question "do you support Herschel Walker?"
Pretty sure you didn't answer that simple question.
I can actually understand your reluctance: it would mean supporting another hypocritical Republican who went on and on about being against ALL abortions, including rape, incest and health of mother. Because, after all, murder. (unless he has to pay for it for his own girlfriend...well then, it's OK)
So, I do understand why you won't answer.
Maybe, he did Paul. Maybe.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
It’s Oct, who knows what is true. :)
I wish Herschel Walker had stayed out of politics. A national treasure ruined.
If I lived in Georgia, I would vote for him over Warnock, but I wouldn't be pleased that those were my choices.
Curious; how do you think, based on what you've seen of Warnock and Walker, that the latter would provide any positive governance for the country?Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
Is it just that he would be a sure R vote?
Is there something in his background that I'm missing that makes you think that?
I didn't like either of Reagan or Bush Jr's politics; but I respected they brought governmental experience to the executive branch; and in both cases that experience was (like Clinton's) executive experience.
Electing reality TV stars or Football coaches/players to very high office doesn't seem to me to be a good approach.
I think they're both terrible candidates for elective office, so I would vote for the one I think would likely vote the way I would prefer on particular pieces of legislation. Neither are likely to be in the middle of creating any legislation that I would want passed, and they're both going to absolutely embarrass themselves in any committee assignments.
OK, I thought my state would have more election big lie people, but Ohio is way out in front.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/elect...table-main-t-3