Shame is one thing. Violent protests preventing speech are something completely different.
Printable View
Shame is one thing. Violent protests preventing speech are something completely different.
You won't hear any argument from me. I agree 100%. There is no place in discourse or legitimate protest for violence, destruction of property, or threats of either. Period. End of Sentence.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
Ted Cruz ripping off that speech in attacking Donald Trump was one of my favorite moments of the campaign.Quote:
Originally Posted by LA Muskie
Public reps since Trump is holding me down.Quote:
Originally Posted by LA Muskie
Women's March is an example of speech/assembly that I approve of.Quote:
Originally Posted by LA Muskie
The riots over Milo on Cal's campus are those that I do not approve of, or the riots during the inauguration.
And I think the ACLU would agree with me.
Yes, obviously. Are taxes optional or are they ultimately enforced by badges and guns?Quote:
Originally Posted by X-man
Wow Just wow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
Not sure what triggered this response. To clarify tax laws are enforced by Federal agencies and law enforcement (i.e. threat of force. You must pay).Quote:
Originally Posted by X-man
To your other point. I don't hate SS (hope it's fixed and I get back what I was forced to pay in). My point was how people spend their SS check is their business as that money was taken from them throughout their lives. Very different then spending/wasting money collected from other taxes that do not necessarily have a specific purpose. They can be appropriated any way the gov't deems proper during the budgeting process.
All this talk about taxing and protests never being legitimate when property is damaged is making me thirsty for some tea.
I'm starting to think Republicans need their own safe spaces. I'm sure this is different though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Juice
GOP finds fix for chaotic town halls: Don’t hold them