Rutgers have some large nil collective I don’t know about? They grabbed the number 2 and 3 ranked basketball recruit for next year. Huh?
Printable View
Rutgers have some large nil collective I don’t know about? They grabbed the number 2 and 3 ranked basketball recruit for next year. Huh?
they are buddies from what I understand Agree too and all it takes is 1-2 large donors who have money to burnQuote:
Originally Posted by Xville
Well it is in NJ, the home of Organized Crime. A mobbed up fan could consider it an investment by having 2 guys he could control. I read recently that even with the BIG boatload of money Rutgers gets, their Athletic Dept is $250million in debt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xville
Purdue getting worked over by a more athletic team. What else is new.
Is duke not very good? Sure seems it. Maybe scheyer isn’t good
I think Hofstra is probably pretty good. And there's still a half to widen the spread.
Slu, who is terrible, beat them.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoMuskies
This game notwithstanding though, I’m wondering what duke is going to look like in 2-3 years.
Speaking of bad teams with a nice win, Bryant kept it interesting with UC. Only down 8 with less than 10 minutes to play. Certainly nothing like our game against them.
All those fouls caught up to Bryant and then the team lost its composure altogether. Not a good look for them, but UC did not look like a team ready for the Big 12 either. I have to say that will be a large mountain for them to climb this year. Kinda like their football team
Court just said multiple transfer athletes don't have to sit a year.
NCAA caved and said OK.
Guys will be swapping schools like trading cards.