Originally Posted by
AviatorX
I mean, the column (not an article) 1) is geared toward Indiana HS fans who are notoriously protective/fired up about HS players leaving the state 2) basically spells out the reason for Scruggs' transfer (rift between AAU/HS coach) and 3) states that Scruggs' recruitment is likely unchanged by the transfer. Soooo not really sure it's the piece you want to point to when randomly asserting Scruggs transferred to get more exposure/isn't likely to come to X.
I don't think it's unreasonable to take the position that the longer someone is uncommitted the worse it is for the perceived leader, but I think here there's a couple of mitigating factors to that -- first, Scruggs had to make a much more pressing decision/life change, and second, nothing has really happened (no visits scheduled, etc.) to indicate a change in his recruitment, and honestly, visiting the other schools involved became more difficult.